return2ozma@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 years ago4-year campaign backdoored iPhones using possibly the most advanced exploit everarstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square59linkfedilinkarrow-up1540arrow-down111cross-posted to: todayilearned@lemmit.onlineprivacy@programming.devtechnology@lemmy.ziphackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fanshackernews@derp.foo
arrow-up1529arrow-down1external-link4-year campaign backdoored iPhones using possibly the most advanced exploit everarstechnica.comreturn2ozma@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 years agomessage-square59linkfedilinkcross-posted to: todayilearned@lemmit.onlineprivacy@programming.devtechnology@lemmy.ziphackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fanshackernews@derp.foo
minus-squarepsud@lemmy.worlddeleted by creatorlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up29arrow-down2·2 years agoIt isn’t persistent over a reboot, but the tested devices received new corrupted iMessages immediately after reboot
minus-squareGlitzyArmrest@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up25·edit-22 years agoPersistent in APT isn’t referring to the malware itself, but rather the threat actor. I meant that this seems like a textbook APT actor.
minus-squareElias Griffin@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down3·2 years agoYou know what else was also super sophisticated, chained, and confident enough in it’s APT to not be persistent across reboots? DOUBLEPULSAR.
It isn’t persistent over a reboot, but the tested devices received new corrupted iMessages immediately after reboot
Persistent in APT isn’t referring to the malware itself, but rather the threat actor. I meant that this seems like a textbook APT actor.
You know what else was also super sophisticated, chained, and confident enough in it’s APT to not be persistent across reboots? DOUBLEPULSAR.
You sure?