Two British minehunter ships destined for Ukraine cannot travel through Turkish waters, Ankara stressed Tuesday, citing an international pact.

U.K. Defense Secretary Grant Shapps announced last month that Ukraine’s armed forces had struck a deal to procure the Sandown Class vessels from Britain’s Royal Navy as the war-torn country grapples with Russia’s continued blockade of the Black Sea.

But Turkey confirmed it had informed its NATO allies that the ships would not be allowed to travel through its waters.

  • stevehobbes@lemy.lol
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Ships have a home port, as defined by the owner of the ship. If a ship is sold, it would typically get a new home port, owned by the new owner.

    All of Ukraine’s ports are in the Black Sea. Hence any ship owned by Ukraine not currently in the Black Sea is sailing back to port.

    Why is that hard to understand?

    Russia has several deep water ports outside of the Black Sea. It’s a slightly different ballgame, wouldn’t you agree?

    • deegeese@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      One cannot “return” to a new “home”.

      You can return to your old home, or move to a new one.

      • stevehobbes@lemy.lol
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        10 months ago

        Really? If you buy a house, the closing happens at the bank, then you can’t return to your home?

        Of course you can.

        • deegeese@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          That would be returning to somewhere you have been before.

          You cannot return to somewhere you have not been.

          • stevehobbes@lemy.lol
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            10 months ago

            That’s semantics - you aren’t a lawyer obviously. Nor, I imagine have you actually read the convention.

            Around February 27–28, Turkey refused permission for three out of four Russian warships to enter the Black Sea as their home base was not on the Black Sea.

            Surely these two new ships home base is in fact the Black Sea.

            • StorminNorman@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              Dunno why you’re dying on this hill when it literally says in the article that nobody expected the ships to be allowed to travel to the Black Sea. It’s almost like the experts know more than some anonymous armchair expert on Lemmy…

              • stevehobbes@lemy.lol
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                9
                ·
                10 months ago

                Nobody expected it because turkey is governed by a tyrant who sucks.

                And he won’t do anything until he gets his pound of flesh whatever it may be. Just like with the Sweden and Finland joining NATO.

                • StorminNorman@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  10 months ago

                  Nobody expected it because there is a literal convention preventing it. Sure, Erdogan is a cunt, but this isn’t the first time Turkey has denied passage. They’ve done it to Russia. They’ve done it to the US. And for all your talk of Erdogan wanting his pound of flesh, nobody is stupid enough to go up against the US defence forces unless they have very solid backing for their stance. Which the convention gives them. This scenario would be completely different if they were making exceptions for some but not others, but they’re not.