• Nougat@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s not better yet, or for everything (arguably not for most things), and the first forays into mechanization of industry weren’t, either. We’re at the very beginning here.

    • ComMcNeil@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Which is actually not a big difference to what companies have done the past couple of decades, namely moving positions from high-cost to low-cost countries. Cost for an AI is problably easier to mask in the balance sheet as well, as costs for human resources.

    • pewter@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      AI is already better… than some people. A human using AI is probably better and faster at certain tasks than a somewhat skilled human is.

      I bet midjourney is better at making concept art than the vast majority of the population.

      I think we have a high threshold for success of AI. I saw a video a while back about how AlphaGo (an AI designed for playing Go) was able to beat a whole bunch of experts in Go. One expert used an atypical move and beat AlphaGo. People started reacting like “see? AI isn’t impressive. This genius beat it.” How many of us are geniuses? How often will geniuses beat better AI?