It’s insane the lengths that some people will go to save a few seconds on their commute, while also endangering others.

  • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    20
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    I’m a car driver and enthusiast and I’ll be the first one to ask… Why the fuck can my car reach 250kph if the highest speed limit in my country is 110kph???

    Edit: If you think I’m complaining that I can’t go faster then you understood the message wrong

    • estoypoopin@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Driving fast in the right circumstances is a blast, no one is denying that. E.g., doing a track day, or even road racing on a closed course. But it’s not the same as driving in public day-to-day. Here in the US southwest, in order to drive a road race in the 150 mph/250 kph class, you need a 5 point harness, fire suppression system, helmet and HANS device.

      You simply don’t need to go that fast on a daily basis. It’s not safe for you, without all the above precautions, and it’s not safe for others around you.

      Auto manufacturers use the top speeds/acceleration/torque stats for marketing. Drivers imagine they will have fun going that fast (see above, they can!), they perceive value in having “better stats”, so the market rewards manufacturers to keep selling daily-driver cars that have unrealistic top speeds. Combine that with the fact that most people can’t afford to have a separate “fun” car, or access to safe locations for motor sports, and we end up seeing people trying to have the fun they imagined on our shared public roadways, which is downright dangerous for everyone.

      Get your kicks on the track. Your car’s top speed does not belong on public roads.

      • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Exactly! I think discussions have started to have speed limiters on new cars sold in Canada and it’s perfectly logical. Why let manufacturers sell cars that can reach speeds that will make people face criminal charges if they get caught? It’s ridiculous enough that we’re switching to electric cars with 0-100kph under 7 seconds and no one bats an eye… The next few decades will be interesting, imagine all the new drivers accidently launching from stop signs in a fairly basic car that does 0-100 in 6 seconds…

        • CoreOffset@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          10 months ago

          It’s ridiculous enough that we’re switching to electric cars with 0-100kph under 7 seconds and no one bats an eye…

          This is a good point.

          Nobody seems to care at all about acceleration even though it can be just as dangerous as sheer speed in the hands of most drivers.

          • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            Yep, there’s a reason why most motorcyclists will tell newbies to start with 650cc or less, uncontrolled acceleration can kill too!

            • CoreOffset@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              10 months ago

              I think the best thing I ever did was learn on a 250cc. It’s way harder to wreck your day or get yourself killed when you inevitably grab a bit too much throttle as a complete newbie. I would even encourage people to learn on a 125cc or even 50cc. The basics are the basics and you can pick those up on a bike with less than 10hp just as easily if not more easily than a bike with 100+hp.

              It would be amazing to see government mandated limiters in cars, in general, and not just for learners.

              I know that a lot of people don’t agree with that but the public has proved they are incapable of driving within reasonable limits. No one needs a car that can go the speeds that cars are capable of going. It’s totally possible to setup a system that enforces the limit only on public roads so that people could still take their cars to the track. We very much have the technology.

              It blows my mind that the general public is completely accepting of things like smartphone OSes that can spy on their every move and log their every detail yet if you mention limiters on cars all of the sudden they become staunch advocates for personal freedoms. The hypocrisy blows my mind.

    • CommodoreSixtyFour_
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      Maybe… because it is dangerous to drive that fast when other people are around? Why don’t you just buy a car that can only go as fast as the highest speed limit?

      • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        Huh? What part of my message made you think I drive over the speed limit? I’m clearly saying that it’s ridiculous that cars are sold without speed limiters!

            • CommodoreSixtyFour_
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              The problem here is not a lack of reading comprehension but rather a lack of you explaining yourself. You see, I could not really see the motivation behind your post because it was so ambiguous. So I think it is not really fair to blame anyone reading your text for not correctly interpreting it they way you wanted it.

    • Uvine_Umbra
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      Because a person from the USA invented the car, why else?