• Truck_kun@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    11 months ago

    If, BIG IF, forfeiture is allowed, it should only be court ordered after a conviction, and recovered funds should not go to anyone related to the seizure, or ordering of forfeiture, as well as no metrics of such forfeiture contributing to any potential bonus, benefit, or payout for ‘a job well done’.

    For sure, police should not be allowed to make that call.

    Stuff like this should never happen: https://www.cnn.com/2014/09/03/us/philadelphia-drug-bust-house-seizure/index.html

    An inanimate objects should not be able to be named as accessories to crime, the owner of the inanimate object should get due process, and in reality, it should be more of an order to investigate, and access given within reason (like a warrant would do), not forfeiture.

    • guyrocket@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      I would prefer to throw that baby out with the bathwater.

      Given how corrupt this is now it seems wiser that this just not be a thing at all. I see your point, but I believe it will encourage backsliding to the insanity we have now.

      Maybe in 20 years.