• chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is an interesting angle. Makes me wonder, do we have a moral duty to reciprocate love and loyalty, or the potential for it? And if not, what basis can there be for treatment of human beings?

    • qyron@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Interesting question from a chicken.

      My concern is not morality and neither is that the issue here.

      The animals we call farm animals today came from what are considered prey animals and the process of domestication was essentialy a process of reducing fear and wariness towards our species.

      Dogs came to be from an apex predator that, we speculate, found advantageous to actively associate with our species for mutual benefit.

      Different origins produced different outcomes.

      • ParsnipWitch@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think there is a much easier explanation. People keep rabbits and guinea pigs as pets. They are much more of a “prey animal” than a wild hog, for example.

        Humans simply find rabbits, dogs and cats more aesthetically pleasing / cute. That’s the whole secret to it. Some animals are liked by humans and get a bare minimum of compassion and some don’t. And that’s the biggest factor in our decision of which animals deserve to rot away in their own filth until slaughtered and which can enter our homes as “entertainers”.

        • qyron@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Those two species got a “promotion” more recently into the realm of company animals but they started as food, due to being prolific and easy to keep. They are more sustainable as well, as a tangent comment.

          We can argue on all fronts. This is speculation, for what it is.