• sciawp@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    Ugh, I once saw a cyclist that had been run over by a cement truck in Hamilton. It’s permanently burned into my brain. Absolutely horrifying that we force cyclists to be in the same place as these deadly vehicles

  • lildictator@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Everybody understands that a person on a bike is in a very vulnerable situation. 99% of drivers respond to that by being considerate, while the remaining 1% take advantage of that power differential to bully their neighbours.

    I don’t have a silver bullet solution, but there are many things we could do to help. Personally, I would start by providing a better cycling experience around schools, which can be done with inexpensive traffic calming measures such as in-street crosswalk signs, raised crosswalks, etc. Traffic calming protects all children, including those who walk and bike to school, and people who grow up riding bicycles are going to be more considerate to cyclists when they drive a car.

  • MarkG_108@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Yikes. It appears the driver was in a rush and hoping to get around the cyclist, but bumped into the cyclist’s rear wheel while trying to swerve around him. However, that may be a too charitable interpretation. The cyclist was far from the curb, clearly in plain view, so the car should have known that swerving past was futile (thus the best thing to do is suck it up and wait and not try to pass). Being blocked by the cyclist (intentionally, it seems), it appears the car driver honked his horn and assumed the cyclist would get out of the way, and then moved to pass. The car driver is clearly at fault here. But, as a cyclist myself, I do wonder sometimes at cyclists who intentionally block cars.

    • Albbi@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Taking the lane isn’t intentionally blocking cars, but forcing them to pass safely. By moving as close to the curb as possible you’re encouraging cars to pass when it isn’t safe, especially since the area of the road near the curb is the roughest and may require some manoeuvring around.

      This car straight up went right behind the bike and hit them, probably frustrated at not being able to get around easily.

      • MarkG_108@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Agreed that generally taking the lane is to force cars to notice you and not encourage them to pass when it isn’t safe. For instance, in Toronto there’s a lot of construction happening, so sometimes there will be two lanes that merge into one for a short bit because of the construction (Bloor around Parliament/Sherbourne is an example). In those circumstances, I’ll clearly take the lane. But when it’s a regular two lane road at a traffic stop, I won’t, because there’s enough room for a car and bike to be side by side in these circumstances. Yes, I realize it’s perfectly legal for me to take the lane, but, just as I appreciate cars that give me space, I also feel it’s a good practice to give cars space as well. To be clear, I’m not excusing the reckless and criminal behaviour of the car driver. The actions of the car driver were criminal and he should face the full force of law.

    • totallynotarobot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      What video are you watching? He drove straight the fuck over the guy. The only “swerving” that happened was that wee turn to make sure he full-on got him.