CCTV footage of incidents adds to concerns over military’s rules of engagement in Occupied Territories

  • timidgoat@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t think it is. If Biden cancelled all aid to Israel over this, I think we’d see a big shift in Israeli policy. Remember what happened when the US finally dropped their support of apartheid SA?

    • 【J】【u】【s】【t】【Z】@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      It would be a big shift in global policy and would be grossly negligent for any US president.

      This view represents a serious misunderstanding of America’s and indeed the western strategy in the Middle East.

      • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Centrist Democrats are getting the genocide they have always wanted.

        The Standard Centrist Gaslighting, the “this is too complex for your feeble progressive mind to comprehend” bullshit, is what centrist Democrats employ whenever they don’t want scrutiny of their positions.

          • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            0.004% of the population dead

            How large a percentage will it take to satiate you?

            Know what? I don’t trust your numbers. I want a source. Show me a reliable source that says that Israel has only killed 0.004% of the population of Gaza.

            • 【J】【u】【s】【t】【Z】@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              11 months ago

              Pretty widely reported. If you’re not familiar with where that figure comes from or how it’s calculated you really don’t know enough about what’s happening there on the ground to have an opinion about what’s happening on the ground.

              Satiate? That’s a weird choice of word. I’m looking at the evidence and trying to evaluate it rationally. What are you doing?

              • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                11 months ago

                Pretty widely reported. If you’re not familiar with where that figure comes from or how it’s calculated you really don’t know enough about what’s happening there on the ground to have an opinion about what’s happening on the ground.

                Right. You made it up and are gaslighting me.

                You made the claim. Back it up.

    • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      Relationships are unique and I don’t think there are many people alive who fully understand the consequences of that move. It likely wouldn’t be just a “oh well I guess we call off the war” situation in any case.

      • timidgoat@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        If anyone understands it, it’s the South African leaders who just presented their genocide case in front of the ICJ. History will remember them.

        • Muyal_Hix@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          Has history remembered Tomas Sankara, Kwame Nkrumah and other african leaders who fought for deconlonization? It hasn’t because they got on the US’ bad side. Heck, if you go to any subreddit and look for what people think of what South Africa is doing, you will see nothing but “We should bring appartheid back to teach them a lesson” among other really bad comments