• Carighan Maconar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Honestly what better are we than Russia if we just start rocketing their shit? Plus so far they’re happy to present their people in broad daylight for targets, no need to kill civilians.

    • Gork@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The long range missiles the West are providing are precision strike weapons so the attacks themselves can minimize civilian casualties.

      Unlike the Russians, Ukraine won’t use them to target maternity wards or apartment complexes. But an electrical substation that distributes power to the Kremlin? Why not.

      • ☭ SaltyIceteaMaker ☭@iusearchlinux.fyi
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Destroying infrastructure will always lead to civilian deaths unless it is a pure military installation. As soon as you destroy just one wrong substation (because your Intel was wrong or whatever) you are killing innocent civilians, even worse if a hospital was hooked up to that sub station

        Edit: had a typo: instead of pure i wrote lure

        • Gork@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          Fair point. It just doesn’t seem fair for Ukraine to not be able to hit back while the Russians strike at will. There needs to be some consequences.