• …And it all has to be there for legacy compatibility, because some Fortune 500 company somewhere has some rickety piece of shit in-house “enterprise” software that relies on some obscure aspect or another of a past Windows version.

    • The_v@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I am sort of partial to those rickity old systems that force them to keep legacy software compatibility.

      I can still load up and use a program that was written 20 years ago for windows XP.

      It also gives third parties like classic shell or startallback the ability to restore all the functionality that the newest start menu disaster tries to push.

    • Moira_Mayhem@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      IT person here: this is absolutely correct. I know of two buildings in a ridiculously expensive zip code known for international trade that their entire HVAC system is run by a grey case XP box that MUST always have internet connection.

      It was considered a cost saving method at the time as opposed to real building services control panels and the company that wrote and sold the software to the local companies went out of business in 2001. There are more businesses in this position just these are the only two I’ve personally been called to service.

      In both cases neither machine had been allowed to reboot for more than a decade because of the legitimate fear that the hard drive bearings would fail if they were allowed to spin down.

      And neither were interested in replacing it