haxor@derp.fooMB to Hacker News@derp.fooEnglish · 1 year agoThe failure of self-checkout technologywww.bbc.comexternal-linkmessage-square10fedilinkarrow-up114arrow-down15file-textcross-posted to: hackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fanstechnology@lemmy.worldtechnology@lemmy.ziptechnology@lemmy.world
arrow-up19arrow-down1external-linkThe failure of self-checkout technologywww.bbc.comhaxor@derp.fooMB to Hacker News@derp.fooEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square10fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: hackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fanstechnology@lemmy.worldtechnology@lemmy.ziptechnology@lemmy.world
minus-squarecoffinwoodlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoI prefer my self-scanned shopping over putting every single item in my cart twice at a conventional register. It sure takes longer because scanning while shopping is still slower. But the advantage of packing my stuff once the way I want it, makes it worth it.
minus-squareFireRetardant@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoAren’t you still putting every item in your cart twice by using self check out?
minus-squarecoffinwoodlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoNo, my favourite store has hand-held scan devices, so I can pack everything the way I want to from start to finish. Only when I buy a handful of things I use the stationary scanner at the self-checkout.
I prefer my self-scanned shopping over putting every single item in my cart twice at a conventional register.
It sure takes longer because scanning while shopping is still slower. But the advantage of packing my stuff once the way I want it, makes it worth it.
Aren’t you still putting every item in your cart twice by using self check out?
No, my favourite store has hand-held scan devices, so I can pack everything the way I want to from start to finish.
Only when I buy a handful of things I use the stationary scanner at the self-checkout.