A full-page newspaper defends the punishment high school student Darryl George has faced over his hairstyle.

  • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    His son shouldn’t be on the road if he’s crashing a five-ton vehicle into a telephone pole. Hiding him in order to sober him up means putting him back out on the road to do this shit again.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        I won’t fault anyone for not wanting to turn their kid over to police over property damage

        When the same guy is pulling kids out of school for their haircuts, I will absolutely fault him. This guy has no concern for anyone outside of his immediate social circle. He’s immiserating children under the pretext of conformity, while keeping his drunk-driving son on the road to potentially kill another family with his reckless behavior.

        Its easy to when you already have a reason to dislike them.

        The contradiction between behaviors - one that’s strictly authoritarian for “conformity” sake and the other that’s hostile to basic traffic laws - illustrates a guy who has no business operating in an administrative capacity.

        • abraxas@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Bingo. If he kicked a kid out for locs and turned his son over to the authorities with a rousing “laws were broken, and I’m not asking for mercy” speech during sentencing, then he’s just an authoritarian-loving jerk and you can respect that even if you won’t grab a drink with him.

          But this guy just likes to exert his white authority over black people. Not his innocent lilly-white drunk-driving son.

          • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            he’s just an authoritarian-loving jerk and you can respect that

            I mean, I wouldn’t respect that either. If anything, I’d respect a guy who shielded his students from draconian municipal/state punishments for a fucking haircut and shielded his son from draconian municipal/state punishments for driving. But you don’t get to be superintendent by going “Soft On (Hair) Crime”.

            But this guy just likes to exert his white authority over black people.

            Or his rich authority over poor people. Although, in Houston, the de facto racial caste system makes it interchangeable.

            • abraxas@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              I mean, I wouldn’t respect that either

              I guess I’m trying to just differentiate two different worlds of behavior . Maybe it’s not as big a deal as I make it, but I have a real problem with inconsistency and hypocrisy.

              • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                11 months ago

                I have a real problem with inconsistency and hypocrisy.

                I think the term “hypocrite” gets overused, mostly because the standard being followed isn’t always what the label implies.

                If you’re a white supremacist or a simple elitist, then there’s no hypocrisy in doing favors for your white son and fucking over your black student. I don’t think that this lack-of-hypocrisy makes the behavior any more laudable, though.