🅿🅸🆇🅴🅻

  • 10 Posts
  • 175 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 11th, 2023

help-circle
  • I didn’t watch the whole video, but I’m assuming it’s about the neural network / reinforcement learning / deep learning kind of AI, which is not GenAI. AlphaFold and such. The more recent version incorporates a diffusion model as one of the steps, which is similar to what LLMs use, but it’s not the main driver.

    Even if it was using LLM technology, it was trained on a data bank of proteins, not god damn Reddit.

    OpenAI, Anthropic and the like have nothing to do with it. They are just wasteful.

    I have no problem with AI in general, only with the GenAI parasites.


  • Do people grasp just how much energy GenAI guzzles?

    If it were used for cancer research, maybe I’d be down with it.

    But no, it’s used by some kids to make memes, create sloppy TikTok content, rewrite emails in posh English that are harder to read, create stereotypical game and movie scripts, reject perfectly qualified people by HR automated CV sorters, dumbs students, creates more fake news, and slightly helps programmers write code faster.

    It’s appalling. If everyone saw it for what it is, a garbage generator, we’d all be in a better place. But that’s not the case, so here we fucking are.






  • I remember it, and I’m a sucker for any SciFi with new ideas, but the delivery on this one had the subtlety of a brick. The idea of the plot is the punchline and that’s it, no other social commentary. Justin Timberlake was mediocre at best and to me so obnoxious that it was very hard to identify with him as a justice warrior. 5/10.

    Don’t Look Up” was not subtle at all, but it had the kind of in-your-face so well done, that proofed exactly that the target audience it was mocking will not understand the direct slap they were getting.

    The Menu”, or “Parasite”, or “The Platform”, or “The Hunger Games” are also orders of magnitude better if you want to watch a “eat-the-rich” kind of movie.

    I’m bad with words and not a movie critic, but hope you get the point.








  • Those share buttons are trackers themselves. So it’s not about “supporting” those websites by publishing content to them, it’s about undermining the privacy of your readers and doing the opposite of what you preach, and “supporting” those websites by feeding them much more valuable user data. As another comment said, just put a button to copy the permalink and let them paste themselves if they want to share.

    As for you sharing a link on the mainstream social media platforms yourself, I’d actually encourage that. Cory Doctorow auto-publishes links (not content) to his articles on as many social media platforms as he can (sorry, can’t find the article in which he describes it). The point is that he still retains control over his content by hosting it himself, he controls the (lack of) trackers and ads, and gaining traffic from these platforms is still to his and his potential readers benefit. Bending your rules a little to reach more people and maybe even convert them to be more privacy-aware is fine.