Unbeteiligte PdS: Medizinstudium aufteilen (Spezialisierung), damit die Arbeitslast verteilt und brain drain beschränkt wird.
Wenn Arbeitskraft fehlt, heißt das meinem Verständnis nach nicht unbedingt dass es keine Arbeitskämpfe mehr gibt. Dennoch hast du Recht, fremdenfeindliche Arbeitskonkurrenz ist nicht akzeptabel; Ukrainer:innen eindimensional als billige Arbeitskräfte darzustellen auch nicht.
I don’t like skinny pants
What is it with firefighters and meat? When I was a member of a small voluntary firefighters brigade, they were really fixated on having meat in the food we got. Needless to say that there were almost no women serving.
Ich glaub das Thema findet nur deshalb so wenig Beachtung weil die Leute aufgegeben haben…
Esperanto foje sonas kiel io, kion infanoj faras per simple aldonado de o al ĉio…
It’s a long night…
animal holocaust
I know they kill using gas chambers, but could we not use that word (not because of carnists, but for the sake of those who survived)?
My roomie has a Sascha Lobo in her bathroom.
Teilweise werden die Stiefel da schon hart geschlabbert.
Sounds more like a tenth grade activity tbh
Hostile Takeover
Lounge chair
I’m certain there is a non zero overlap between the two groups.
The only furry I know IRL is vegan, so anecdotical evidence I guess?
Relevant paper
Cole M, Morgan K. Vegaphobia: derogatory discourses of veganism and the reproduction of speciesism in UK national newspapers. Br J Sociol. 2011 Mar;62(1):134-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-4446.2010.01348.x. PMID: 21361905.
Furries could know better.
Veganism is (mostly) binary for a reason. You either kill and exploit non-human animals for your pleasure (taste, comfort, affordability, i.e. a want) or you don’t (exceptions exist, but mostly represent needs and not wants, e.g. conditions, intial acclimatisation etc.)
Veganism and Vegetarianism are not two steps of the same ladder. I’m not an expert on vegetarianism, but AFAIK vegetarianism aims to avoid meat-eating. Veganism aims to minimise suffering from the killing and exploitation of (non-human) animals by abstaining from consuming products directly made from (non-human) animals.
Veganism isn’t inherently utilitarian. I don’t agree with them, but there are vegans who are climate change (impact) denialists. I don’t agree that giving up on veganism (which has huge climate action potential) for some vague ‘free energy’ is a viable climate action path that doesn’t follow RCP8.5. Nevertheless, I consider those either-or, dichotomy debates as delayist discourse or simply put fossil fuel arguments. Food AND Energy need to cut emissions completely.
Good to know.