• 69 Posts
  • 848 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: February 2nd, 2024

help-circle






  • Wikipedia also just upped their standards in another area - they’ve updated their speedy deletion policy, enabling the admins to bypass standard Wikipedia bureaucracy and swiftly nuke AI slop articles which meet one of two conditions:

    • "Communication intended for the userā€, referring to sentences directly aimed at the promptfondler using the LLM (e.g. "Here is your Wikipedia article on…,ā€ ā€œUp to my last training update …,ā€ and "as a large language model.ā€)

    • Blatantly incorrect citations (examples given are external links to papers/books which don’t exist, and links which lead to something completely unrelated)

    Ilyas Lebleu, who contributed to the update in policy, has described this as a ā€œband-aidā€ that leaves Wikipedia in a better position than before, but not a perfect one. Personally, I expect this solution will be sufficent to permanently stop the influx of AI slop articles. Between promptfondlers’ utter inability to recognise low-quality/incorrect citations, and their severe laziness and lack of care for their ā€œā€ā€œworkā€ā€œā€, the risk of an AI slop article being sufficiently subtle to avoid speedy deletion is virtually zero.




  • I’m sure you can think of hypothetical use cases for Google Glass and Meta AI RayBans. But these alleged non-creepshot use cases already failed to keep Google Glass alive. I predict they won’t be enough to keep Meta AI RayBans alive.

    Its not an intentional use case, but its an easy way to identify people who I should keep far, far away from.

    It turns out normal people really do not like this stuff, and I doubt the public image of tech bros has improved between 2014 and 2025. So have fun out there with your public pariah glasses. If you just get strong words, count yourself lucky.

    On a wider note, I wouldn’t be shocked if we heard of Rapist RayBan wearers getting beaten up or shot in the street - if the torching of Waymos in anti-ICE protests, the widespread vandalism of Cybertrucks, and Luigi Mangione’s status as a folk hero are anything to go by, I’d say the conditions are right for cases of outright violence against anyone viewed as supporting the techbros.

    EDIT: Un-fucked the finishing sentence, and added a nod to Cybertrucks getting fucked up.







  • I don’t need that, in fact it would be vastly superior to just ā€œstealā€ from one particularly good implementation that has a compatible license you can just comply with. (And better yet to try to avoid copying the code and to find a library if at all possible). Why in the fuck even do the copyright laundering on code that is under MIT or similar license? The authors literally tell you that you can just use it.

    I’d say its a combo of them feeling entitled to plagiarise people’s work and fundamentally not respecting the work of others (a point OpenAI’s Studio Ghibli abomination machine demonstrated at humanity’s expense.

    On a wider front, I expect this AI bubble’s gonna cripple the popularity of FOSS licenses - the expectation of properly credited work was a major aspect of the current FOSS ecosystem, and that expectation has been kneecapped by the automated plagiarism machines, and programmers are likely gonna be much stingier with sharing their work because of it.






  • Saatchi says you can type in a few words and the AI will generate scenes — or even a whole show. There are two test shows. One is Exit Valley, which is a copy of South Park set in Silicon Valley. Here’s an excerpt. [Vimeo]

    For anyone who decides not to click, you’re not missing out - the ā€œepisodeā€ was equivalent to one of those millions of shitty GoAnimate ā€œgroundedā€ animations that you can find on YouTube. (in retrospect, GoAnimate/Vyond was basically AI slop before AI slop was a thing)

    The closest that has to a use case is the guys who will do obnoxious parodies because the rights holders won’t like them. Let’s get Mickey Mouse doing something edgy!

    Considering Tay AI was deliberately derailed into becoming a Hitler-loving sex robot, and the first wave of AI slop featured deliberately offensive Pixar-styled ā€œpostersā€, I can absolutely see this happening. (At least until The Mouse starts threatening Showrunner with getting sued into the ground.)