BynarsAreOk [none/use name]

  • 19 Posts
  • 928 Comments
Joined 4 years ago
cake
Cake day: March 16th, 2021

help-circle

  • The issue is not really dedollarization here, there is no need to fixate on that.

    Rather the fact this is further signs of Chinese integrating with western capital at the most critical juncture.

    The part about Saudi Arabia trying to pivot into some sort of Hong Kong 2.0 is accurate as its one of the ways they hope to survival the oil crash. It is also part of the ME own internal struggle between the oil exporters to see who comes out on top. OPEC is doing production cuts and Oil is once again at the 2 year low. Saudi Arabia is rather trying survive by pivoting into financial speculation, putting it in competition with the UAE for example.

    As reported 2 billion is quite literally nothing in the grand scheme so why bother at all? Because it signals a complete Chinese compromise with the western consensus. Its China being absurdly simplistic and trying to secure their own slice of the pie.

    Major financial corporations are all moving to Riyadh’s financial center, just this year there is Goldman Sachs which was the first significant Wall St player just barely last month, HSBC, Rothschild. Even the Hong Kong Stock Exchange is opening a new office there. You can probably make a long list soon.

    So both Chinese and the Western capital see the potential of Saudi Arabia realy becoming a financial hub(or simply don’t want to miss it) and China wants to secure good relations before its completely bought out by US interests. Yes they are that naive. Heck in this instance I’d go even further and saying there is absolutely acting as if their married to the devil. If they weren’t what would explain to us their previous deals and investments in Israel during the 2010’s and even earlier?

    Its quite the epitome of trying constantly pandering about being an alternative to US imperialism and denouncing western crimes while simultaneously happily making deals with the worst enemies of the global south.

    It is as bad as it sounds.



  • In order of most likely/immidiate:

    Invade Mexico to secure the border and fight the cartel, in reality just an excuse to round up everyone who doesn’t speak English in a Guantanamo 2.0 right on the border while doing the same obama-drone on random Mexican schools and bars/markets “owned by the cartel” or some shit.

    Next if somehow US goes to war with China you can absolutely expect Asian concentration camps.

    Then inevitably I don’t see the US surviving climate change without doing the whole “cleaning the cities” first. At first it will be homeless and drug addicts. Then it will be LGBTQ and in the end it will be camps for climate migrants between states e.g Florida.


  • Not sure how reliable that is given the pretty much apocalyptic dead internet era we’re living in specially now during the AI boom.

    What exactly is twitter offering when everyone knows its full of bots already? When a significant amount of clout seekers often posting AI content too.

    Twitter isn’t dead, but the reason advertisers left in the first place isn’t going to change overnight. Yes you can quote some random consultant’s speculation but this is more than likely the usual political speculation libs love to do rather than meaningful analysis of the economic situation.

    Its almost as if they’re not talking about the US where lobbying is legal, if advertisers care so much then can pay congress for what they want already and if staying on twitter was profitable at all they would not have left. Its not clear why the speculation this will change overnight, it seems more like lib moral panic for me.


  • I disagree entirely by your reasoning Bolton would still be there.

    We all know Trump isn’t just incompetent but extremely egotistical and he is already significantly older and probably not that far off from Biden’s coginitive decline.

    Essentialy while some standard neocon might get in right now there is realy no reason to indicate this will be sustained for 4 years let alone to believe Trump was already planning around “neocons” having power as a compromise.

    I doubt Trump even understands neoconservatism and neoliberalism.

    Remember Hinkle here is the near perfect duplicate of Tucker Carlson blasting Trump for escalating with Iran. Only obviously Hinkle is far less influential. But if MAGA substantialy opposes this(for the dumbest reasons) its very likely Trump will flip flop.

    I think this is the whole thesis why Trump was even considered possibly a better alternative. There is a very specific narrative angle where MAGA stands completely opposite to neoconservatism and that is Russia as an ally of white supremacy. In general neocons pushing the old Bush era war is entirely against this idea the US even got “allies” outside the liberal sphere in the first place. MAGA fundamentaly can’t reconcile having shit EU libs or turbo NATO heads as allies or even having the idea they’re the ones in charge.

    Democrats and Biden made sure to ally themselves with neocons as Biden made sure to praise NATO and Israel, reminding us how much he loves it every god damn press meeting during the election.


  • Bad news specially if as predicted Brazil fucks themselves as Lula’s government is about to do with cutting social programs right before the crucial pre-'26 election cycle. Once Brazil is compromised BRICS will have no influence in the region, questionable as it already is since Cuba being a new “partner” member is not relevant yet.

    Currently a big struggle within the Brazilian government along with massive progressive/left wing parties and unions pushing back. Its not even a victory to make things better which is the shit part, its always the usual fight to stop neoliberal ghouls from making things worse and in this case a completely suicidal blow to Lula’s re-election chances.




  • I was here since the beginning but this is not my original account. What made HB unique to me is it was that time where this is the only place that had a concretly reasonable and different view about China and other AES countries. There were some other places like Genzedong(only a lurker there) but it was banned and it since died.

    I’ve seen a lot of struggle sessions about that, first it was China, I particularly remember some random person willing to die on a hill that China’s handling of terrorism in Xinjiang was just like the state police apparatus resembling post 9/11 America.

    But 2022 was realy funny, the epic struggle session over why would Putin suddenly do this to smol bean innocent Ukraine. Again this was the only place I knew which we were even discussing about having a different opinion from the western consensus.

    I think the way which we handled the Gaza genocide, again one of the few places that isn’t scared of the MSM narrative or afraid to fight Zionism.

    I think when it comes to the real world issues we mostly eventualy found the correct majority opinion on things that matter. If at any point I felt these positions would’ve been different from mine I would’ve probably left already.

    When it comes to China I think the near constant unironic Xi posting was a bit too much for me personaly specialy. 2020-22 were great years and I would be right there 100% agreeing with this as Xi is definitely a great leader, will be remembered as a key and historically important figure, undeniably.

    But the decision making that led to that horrible stupid meeting with Hitler in the middle of the genocide and their similar timid stance against Israel is the closest I’ve come to a serious disagreement with some people here that obviously love unironic shallow pro-CPC-Xi meme posting. As such 2023-24 are horrible years imo.

    But otherwise I don’t see a reason why I’d ever leave. We’ll see how this community handles China in the future, for both ourselves and the future of socialism I hope the CPC wont continue with this shitty timid conciliatory stance towards the west as the world continues to burn and the ropes tighten.


  • oh also the people dunking on people online for being sad about the election results. yeah kamala winning probably wouldn’t be better but assuming everyone who’s sad is a democrat is massively uncharitable

    This is an extremely L take, you’re talking specificaly about the election results yeah? That already excludes people who are sad about both candidates being the same on issues like Gaza. If you already understood both candidates are shit the election itself shouldn’t make you any more sad then any other day during the past year of genocide for example.

    To be sad about Trump winning means the actualy believe the mainstream rethoric, which means they’re not an ally or at best they’re still very far away from having a concrete view about current issues so their opinion is mostly worthless or at the very best just noise.

    Its not uncharitable to say if you’re only sad now that you’re probably a shit lib that deserves to be dunked on. We’re not changing their minds, if we were capable of that then they’ve turned into a socialist or abandoned the dems at least when they saw any of the Gaza hospitals being bombed and not when orange man won the election.

    Point is, even if you’re not necessarily a socialist but already abandoned the Dems following Oct 7th you’re not going to be particularly sad about Trump. Same on any other issue the dems refused to fight on.



  • Sanctions on BRICS already exist and they’ll continue regardless.

    I think for now many of the social media/mil bloggers are saying the war will continue and Trump is mostly shit. Here Yuri Podolyak https://t.me/yurasumy/19005 Google TL

    Will President Trump Achieve “Peace in Ukraine”: Positions of the Parties and the Experience of the DPRK…

    Back during his election campaign, then presidential candidate Donald Trump said that he would quickly solve the problem of Ukraine and stop this war. And now he is the president and, as they used to say in my youth, “you have to answer for your words.” And so, already yesterday, the future key figures of his administration began to carefully test the waters in this direction, making various statements about their vision of solving the “Ukrainian problem.” If we isolate the main thing, then they understand it like this - freezing the conflict on the current front line, temporary non-acceptance of Ukraine as a member of NATO, peacekeepers in the buffer zone. In essence, the Trump administration is offering Russia yet another Minsk agreement. We already know the price of such “agreements.”

    This is actually a respite before pumping Ukraine with NATO weapons in large quantities and, in the future, another attempt at revenge in our generation. Meanwhile, yesterday at Valdai, our president, answering questions about Ukraine, once again threw his vision of solving this problem to the other side. The West must accept Russia’s new borders. Moreover, given that the war continues and the “front is dynamic”, other possible expressions of war by citizens (if any) must also be taken into account in the future agreement. Also, literally the day before, it was once again emphasized that the remaining demands - neutral status, disarmament and denazification of the remnants of Ukraine … are not discussed. This must be part of the agreement.

    Thus, we see that the positions of the parties (the US and Russia) on the issue of peace in Ukraine are still very different. And I would also like to remind you here that during his last term, Donald Trump already promised to “quickly resolve” the DPRK problem. And he really did it very actively and demonstratively. Only in the end, he was unable to reach a real agreement, and the DPRK is now a reliable ally of Russia.


  • a bunch of powerless people venting their rage by getting mad at other powerless people is toxic and fosters misanthropy, the outlawing of dunking on private people is meant to shift the rage to more deserving targets

    Excuse me but seriously? The same people featured in those comms that would rather put US in front of a wall or in the genocide camps.

    We’re not riding this out with naive ideals about peace and love of the human race. Its fine to have enemies, as a matter of fact we have enemies, a lot of them. For some of the LGBTQ on this community they know even better. This is liberalism period. Love everyone kindly we say as they put the guns in our forehead and prepare to shoot?

    IMO real misanthropy is actual fascism or things like e.g ecofascism. We’re nowhere near this as a community and its even silly to suggest posting about random Muskoid #2156 being horrible is pushing us there specialy when its that chud that would gladly be the first one to put everyone here in a camp or worst.

    This type of reasoning is so extremely naive its not even funny. You’ll not get people to stop wishing for westerners to suffer just because the dunk tank is gone. Have some introspection. People are frustrated exactly because nothing is being done and nothing is changing except for the worse. The root cause is not a random comm of a website with like 200 active users.

    The frustration that manifests with wishes of retribution and even violence are rooted in real events, Oct 7th being the obvious one. You’re not changing anything here and seems largely missing the point of how we got her.e.





  • The DPRK deal is a sign Russia is confident they can go on this war for the long term, including the fact they’re potentialy agreeing to pivoting to Asia if necessary it would be stupid then to compromise on a war they’re massively winning right now.

    Also keep in mind there are people further right from Putin that would seriously threaten the government if they fumble this war.

    prigo-pog didn’t have support because he was seen as an idiot, selfish who was threatning the war goals with his petty shit. No matter the popular grievances against the MOD/military incompetence at the time, the bigger picture will always win.

    But Putin taking some shitty deal right now is definitely going to be the wrong move that puts his own credibility on the line, you can’t talk about “denazification” or even dog whistle about conquest and then turn around and take this sort of compromise, not right now anyway.


  • I’m sorry dude, but please understand that the entire left, not just PT got absolutely crushed during the mayoral elections. If you know even some spanish I realy recommend turn on the auto subtitles and watch Jones Manoel(historian, Marxist-Lenist), here just on the first 5 minutes Jones Manoel analyzes the direction of the left in Brazil after the elections

    And you’ll look at the results, one worse than the other, on the one hand, on the other, in the Brazilian northeast, there is a myth that the Northeast is progressive, that the Northeast is left-wing, that the Northeast is the barrier against fascism. In the Brazilian northeast, of the capitals, the extreme right only didn’t win two: Recife and Fortaleza, the extreme right and the traditional right, right? And even so, in Recife, you can’t call João Campos left-wing, right? We can develop this better, but this way it’s not a one.

    In the northeast there was a huge advance in the traditional right and the far right with some very striking results, for example, Bruno Reis managed to be reelected in the first round with an overwhelming vote, being the fifth term of the PT in Bahia, right? The government, Bahia is 20 years old. You see, and the third striking fact that we can’t ignore is the result of the election in Porto Alegre and São Paulo, right? Rio Grande do Sul.

    In the 103 largest cities in Brazil, where is the center of the political and economic population dynamics, what was the result? Left slash center left only won 10 city halls. The far right and the right won 93, it’s 93 to 10. You know, this is like making a football metaphor of losing to 7 to 1. Oh, I scored a goal, but we conceded seven. You see, 9 to 1 is actually the far right and the right won in 93 cities. Of the 103 largest cities in Brazil, which concentrate the majority of the population’s GDP, you see.

    And then if we go making the cut by capitals the situation doesn’t improve I was here with the data it’s easy but I ended up losing it I found capitals There are 26 capitals right the PSD took five the MDB took five União Brasil took four the PL took four PP took two Podemos took two PT PSB Forward Republicans one of each When you will see the division in the 26 capitals there are 13 governed by the extreme right 2 by the left slash center left and 11 by the right and center right

    it is worth saying one thing that is fundamental it is worth saying one thing see the president Luís Inácio Lula da Silva remained oblivious to the campaign knowing that it was Rota and admitting his very low capacity to transfer votes he was left out of the Municipal campaign so the government already admits that the President of the Republic does not have the capacity to effectively transfer votes and withdrew from the dispute so as not to stick the defeat to the presidency itself I think this says a lot about the direction of this so whoever calls this a Victory is deceiving themselves


  • Ok so its not just about economics even though its what we talk about here.

    The main issue stems from the Dilma coup, the neoliberal governments since 2016 until now including Lula 2.0(Lula 1 in some ways and certainly Dilma were already neolibs but I digress). Among all the usual austerity measures is the most important one, the Constitutional Amendment of the Public Expenditure Cap.

    This is the key the underlines any Brazilian government since 2016 and is the main issue the left and Lula needed to fight in order to not lose again.

    This budget cap is one of the most insane pieces of legislation anywhere in the world. It mandates a 20 year freeze on spending. It does not recognize Brazil as a third world country that needs disproportionaly higher social spenditure to “catch up”.

    But the key is it is incompatible with the long established constitutional mandated healthcare and education spending floor. Currently Brazil has a mandated floor of 15% and 18% for each.

    So why both of these matter? The attack is currently coming together almost as if perfectly timed to coincide with the leftist in power. Its not like this is new though, from the beginning 8 years ago everyone knew eventualy the healthcare and education spending floor would be attacked.

    The neoliberal financial market is currently attacking through high interest rates and inflation fearmongering and the left/Lula government is capitulating. Brazil looks at curbing health, education spending in fiscal package, sources say.

    Government austerity means cutting social programs, worst case scenario perhaps even significantly gutting the public healthcare system(SUS). Ultimately this is political suicide. The left will be absolutely crushed in 2026 as the left was already completely crushed during the latest mayoral elections last month.

    It is a warning that the Worker’s Party doesn’t care. The Brazilian mainstream left got a serious Lula worship problem. It realy is TINA but its clear from the recent elections this will be a crushing defeat.

    Economically the bigger picture it means several things including the future prospect of a complete victory of the financial rentier capital class over the still relatively strong and rich agricultural exporting capitalists(beef, coffee, soybean both for US and China etc).

    If this victory is confirmed its going to be far worse than Argentina. It means no BRICS or China relationship. It means a possible Venezuela invasion or worse.

    So is it all just about Trump? Not realy, Trump’s victory is a financial market dream giving every excuse to shit on emerging market currencies.