I read it as “The rule of Shrek” 😭

I’m so happy I saw Life of Brian after I had experienced leftist discourse firsthand, otherwise it would have all gone over my head.

Plot twist twist: Turns out there’s only 2 people, one genuine user and CriticalResist8 who controls every single account except for the readers!

Or…

Plot twist twist twist: We are all alt accounts in this giant 4D chess psyop just to fuck with the one true user Wisconcom!!!

Plot twist CriticalResist8 is the alt account and we are dealing with a deeper and more meta, primary account pulling the strings >:)

So confused, just what?

Love how energetic and funny Hakim is on the podcast, a side you don’t get to see on his channel a whole lot.

His laugh is adorable.

Okay this helpful but I have a few more questions.

So I agree, that non indigenous people are part of the settler state and thus are considered settlers, but why are they (specifically white people) considered non revolutionary? (I mean we are both considered settlers, yet we are communists)

Is it not in the best interests of both to dismantle the Empire? Is that labour aristocracy exists? Cause I don’t think that is strong as it is anymore and especially with inflation, it seems to be reaching a screeching halt.

Isn’t it more that the state itself funnels, or least tries to, white people into petty bourgeois positions to separate the working class, instead of every single white person being of petty bourgeoisie class? Because it feels pretty Un Marxist to say blue collar, trailer park types aren’t proletarian, but maybe that’s what you were getting at and I misconstrued. But even then, arent petty bourgeois intrests with the proletariat?

Now sorta related, but should MLs in North America, especially the US, support every single secession movement or only specific ones? Should we support Texas seceding because it will be less colonized, and will weaken the Empire, plus might get the ball rolling other “states”?

Again, no malice just questions.

Okay you seem to be itching a scratch I have in my brain.

Good of you to point out that “balkanization” is a dishonest term, and more appropriately it is decolonization.

But I have a few more questions about Land back.

Does Land Back view white people as settlers? If so why? is it that they’re descendants of settlers so them existing is a remnant of that, or only those who uphold the ideas that “America” and “Canada” exist, or something else entirely?

Now is Land Back a movement for ALL of the land to be returned to the different indigenous nations? If the notion is white people are intrinsically settlers, what do they want to do with them? If the notion is that it is just the STATE that’s a settler state, does the majority of white people in these nations dillude them being Indigenous?

Now when “America” and “Canada” first colonized there wasn’t a proletariat, and it was all settlers. Now as throughout time, the majority of the populations, are wage earners.

So is it fair to call white people settlers in a STATE apparatus formed centuries ago, that enslaves them?

Is it Anti Marxist to return to the way things were, discounting the new conditions formed for all working people? Is there any historical example of decolonizing a Settler State? If white people are born on native land, are they apart of that indigenous nation? Is this an issues of Nationhood and borders in general, or the specific parts of a settler state?

Again, just questions.

When I was in Middle School, I was assigned with the smart kids who going places, to do an Animal Farm trial. Looking back super manipulative and blatant propaganda, but I was assigned to Squealer cause I was loud af (still am). Anyways this is me saying that I as an outspoken communist voice in my area, and in support of Stalin, makes me wondered if I am a commie by internalizing Squealer.