The reason I compare them to autocomplete is that they’re token predictors, just like autocomplete.
They take your prompt and predict the first word of the answer. Then they take the result and predict the next word. Repeat until a minimum length is reached and the answer seems complete. Yes, they’re a tad smarter than autocorrect, but they understand just as little of the text they produce. The text will be mostly grammatically correct, but they don’t understand it. Much like a compiler can tell you if your code is syntactically correct, but can’t judge the logic.

Getting an explanation is one thing, getting a complete solution is another. Even if you then verify with a more suited tool. It’s still not your solution and you didn’t fully understand it.

Or, and hear me out on this, you could actually learn and understand it yourself! You know? The thing you go to university for?
What would you say if, say, it came to light that an engineer had outsourced the statical analysis of a bridge to some half baked autocomplete? I’d lose any trust in that bridge and respect for that engineer and would hope they’re stripped of their title and held personally responsible.

These things currently are worse than useless, by sometimes being right. It gives people the wrong impression that you can actually rely on them.

Edit: just came across this MIT study regarding the cognitive impact of using LLMs: https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.08872

Spezifisch die CSU. Es gibt kein Niveau das die nicht unterbieten.

Not sure where you take the N from. Plus it’s needlessly derogatory. How about FMAGA instead? Because F MAGA!

Wouldn’t that be a great use case for a QR-code?

Didn’t weigh them before drying because they were still on the branches. But post drying the flowers were very brittle and in the swamp bags the hygrometer initially showed <30% humidity. It eventually crept up to ~55% over the two week cure, thanks to the Boveda packs.

Well, Wile E. Coyote, no? Road Runner just runs away.

Ist ein schönes Land. Aber die Leute… 🙄

42,39g dry. Think I overdried it a little.

Here’s a wild idea: sit on the blunt side.
Yes, it still won’t be comfortable, but I doubt sitting on a stick with your full weight is, either.

Yes, most times gamescope isn’t required. Thing is, sometimes it is and not having the option is an inconvenience in the best case and makes games unplayable in the worst case.

My partner is currently running PopOS. They somehow managed to combine the chronically outdated Ubuntu packages with a rather counterintuitive UI.
Updates frequently fail, commonly used packages like gamescope aren’t available, overall wouldn’t recommend.

Had it on my Fairphone 4 for a while, but was put off by the very iOS look-and-feel. Ditched it on favour of Lineage.

I moved to Qobuz for that reason. Much better payout for the artists.

I get that. But that doesn’t mean you can demand someone else investing a lot of time in what is commonly unpaid work.

Well, you’re free to patch support for your ancient OS back in. But you can’t expect someone else to do it for free.

Can the more experienced growers maybe weigh in? Definitely getting autumn colours, pistils are ~50% darkened, trichomes seem to be mostly milky, as best I can tell. I don’t have a microscope to check. Some trichs over purple leaves look more amber. Harvest already?

😱

Ob da der Alkohol schuld ist?