we use language in different contexts. In the food store “fruit” has one meaning, while in a botany paper, it has another.

This doesn’t say theres no such thing as fish generally, it says there is no useful definition for it in a biological setting.

2000s: Actually, fish aren’t fish

https://www.sciencealert.com/actually-there-is-no-such-thing-as-a-fish-say-cladists

“we towed it outside the environment”

still is

/i3gang

skill issue

I am very anger

is it?

then why the fuck is this newsworthy? ugh. Why is there such a huge hateboner for firefox lately?

modern cpus has an energy density on par with nuclear power plant cores.

they need cooling, money cant break physics.

deleted by creator

fun fact, the RFC introducing NAT calls it a “short-term solution”

https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc1631

and mormonism

Fun fact, their website is still up https://www.heavensgate.com/

fair point, but to get there you must go to the comments to begin with, which I believe might be less likely you do when you don’t have something to say.

on the other hand, there is generally not much to discuss if you have an agreeing position. right?

“no true scotsman”

tell me one food that isn’t made of chemicals

shitting my hands

deleted by creator

message in a butthole