In basketball, you must always have two limbs touching the ground when you have the ball, unless you are standing, shooting, or jumping. Why? I don’t like basketball and think it would be funny as he’ll.

I prefer to think of merging it into the gestalt.

I forgot about the orbs. Maybe I’m less of a wizard type and more of a lamp type than I thought.

There is generally a greater range in the physical capabilities of either sex than there are between the sexes, and in our modern world the number of jobs that require brute strength, those traditionally done by men, are progressively fewer simply due to the benefits of advanced machinery.

As for mental tasks, there are almost none that men or women are better at for any other reason than social programming and, again, in those the variability within the sexes are very nearly as great as those between the sexes.

So, at this point, the biggest reason for gendered tasks is tradition, which is generally the stupidest reason to do anything. So it’s just as ridiculous to bring gender into the task in the first place.

While this is true, there is a considerable amount of overlap between men and women, and a great deal of skills and tasks can be done by either gender.

There are absolutely jobs where hiring the most qualified person for the job is critical. There are a lot of jobs where the threshold for good enough is far below that, and most companies are at least as concerned at getting the cheapest labor that can fulfill the position as they are at getting the best person (at that lower rate). Adding additional constraints like diversity isn’t going to affect those jobs any more than the company’s desire to save a buck.

So if a company traditionally had 10 men employees and now has committed to having gender equality, you see this as 5 jobs where men are no longer considered, rather than it historically being 10 jobs where women weren’t considered?

But your statement implies it’s some impossible feat, and not simply a lack of funding, and maybe it is impossible, but how would we know if we never properly fund it? Moreover, you associated it with a propaganda reference, and I’m not even sure what you’re getting at there.

Sure. I can shit in a pot in the living room of my house if I want, but just because it’s my house doesn’t mean I’m not being a filthy pig. Likewise with abuse of power. More importantly, this is VS’s place that he created as a place for people to hang out. At that point he invited criticism for how he cleans his house.

Amazing warriors when you consider they didn’t have legs.

“It’s not an abuse of power because he bestowed the power upon himself, and therefore only he can declare it as abuse.”

The king can break no laws.

I like The Orville. I don’t mind Discovery. I definitely need to watch more newer Trek. And I’m okay with everything you said because they’re just fucking TV shows! We’re allowed to have opinions about them, just like we have opinions about clothing. It doesn’t make either of us wrong, just different.

Keep up the amazing meme generation.

You’re leaning into this, so here’s a chart.

“I’m going to hide in the forest and attack the Sheriff’s people. Now what should I wear?” Spots red hood.“Perfect!”

Perhaps. I’m certainly not going to stop you from testing that hypothesis.

The recommendations of infidelity, introducing mentally unstable people into your life, lying…

The facts of your statement are generally correct. The advice of what to do with that were in another comment, so not reducing the correctness of the comment I was referring to. The advice itself can lead to a very exciting life.

One of those rare moments when a statement is completely wrong and completely right at the same time.

Buying prerelease is always a big gamble. Buying before there are reviews from trusted sources is also a bit of a gamble.

Buying games 7 or 8 years after release is generally a pretty safe bet.

Some of the monitors are going smart. I won’t be buying those.