• 59 Posts
  • 2.36K Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 9th, 2023

help-circle



  • As he did.

    DHS Also has rules banning shooting at moving vehicles.

    But it is very clear from the video framed from behind the victims car… During all 3 shots both his feet can be seen to the left of the car.

    Killing the driver of a car heading towards you is about the dumbest way to stop a car. Even if the driver was intent on hitting a person. A dead driver is unable to take his foot of the pedal.

    Also. Given the position of the windscreen bullet hole. No angle where the shooter is in the front of the car. Would he be aiming at the driver. In fact he would have to be aiming at the other ICE agent. Or the driver would have to have her head outside the window, while the videos make it clear she was not.

    This was a murder. His past experience may be his motivation. But self defense clearly was not.





  • Note: This is in no way me supporting the gov. Just considering the thought process.

    While the gov seems not to care about public opinion.

    It seems likely drawing that conclusion and banning a well known person. May be such a bad move even Starmer was hesitant. His option likely were.

    Allow her in. Knowing she will protest. At least he can jail her.

    Reject her where she will still protest and have huge access to the media while explaining the UKs argument.






  • Not sure they are required to have a coherent view on the solution.

    As the complaint is that the prisoners are being treated like terrorists. For comiting property damage. At a time when their org was in no way classed as terrorists.

    The hypocrisy of solutions is part of the point of the complaint. IE they should not be treated the way they are. So folks objecting to the treatment have zero requirement to define a solution that allows the gov to continue to treat them that way.

    Put bluntly novaras claim is they demands are.

    Stop calling protesters terrorist’s. Stop supporting genocide. And treat them based on the crime they committed. Property damage.

    The government choice is to agree to this. Or suffer the media backlash of their actions.

    The idea "Their options are let them die or force feed them”. is just a totally false statement.

    Their job is to point that falsehood out. Not provide a solution that allows the gov to continue abuse.



  • USA Citizens have no process to throw him out. Only Congress or the senate can.

    As for raising up and revolting. That will be as effective as errm. Let’s say “using a tiny navy to support oil tankers against the worlds biggest navy” IE it just looks like a protest. Note his move to send red state national guards into blue state cities. Dispite their violence crime being lower then red states. And his call to call any protesters terrorist’s.

    It could be argued Civil war is just a matter of a change of words.


  • Yeah. If you read right wing media. Conference looked like a mess.

    If you actually re,e,ner it is a democratic member led party setting up its own rules.

    Then it just looked like any other collection of disagreeing voters.

    Media accusing founding ,e,bers of boycotting a conference. While interviewing her at the conference where she was not expected to speak the next day.

    Because she expressed a negative opinion.

    Unsurprisingly what is by any other parties standards a absolute success. Looks like a disaster to those not involved.

    If you have been to any others parties conference. Lack of media give a shit. is the only difference is how much disagreement you see,