AI cannot take your job. But 10 years ago. It could not make many jobs any easier.

People are worried because AI is developing at a rate. Where the people currently paying you. Clearly think its development is worth huge funding. And they will only do this if they have reason to beltpaying you becomes less needed.

Last time we saw this. Was factory spending on robotics in the 1970s. Many then said they would take no jobs. Those of us older watched a direct reduction in jobs linked to this. And are expecting similar levels for AI in the next few decades.

And the reason they are pushing that shit. Is not to convince you your job is at risk. They do not want you to panic.

They push it to convince customers to accept the work AIs provide. Just like we now accept mass production way more then my parents generation did. We now expect identical rather then craftsman individualist production. Flat pack furniture produced by machine made wood. Etc etc.

Trump a dumpa.

It is possible. Because the rich and powerful go totally bonkers when AI comes up.

Why do you think the rich are so keen to see it. Sure as hell not to increase the cost of doing business.

I’ll buy AI will never have the power claimed. But it already has the power to replace a metric fuck ton of jobs. And lots of the so called rich and powerful are working fucking hard to make sure folks feel comfortable relying on it.

You have to be pretty blind to think they are doing that for any other reason then to enhance there own position on the inequality scale.

Would have a point. If this was about him facing charges.

But it’s his employer. Any one who has worked knows Thier employer will never support this when acting in their name.

If you work retail even security no company is going to let you act to stop violence when in their name. They all make it clear to employees. Let the criminal go. Otherwise the company is too worried about taking responsibility for any harm customer or criminal.

It may not be right. But hardly a suprise.

More to the point. Taxing enough to pay it. Would make the billionaires investing in AI pointless. So such billionaires will never let it happen.

No one is investing in AI for the good of a nation. Just to save money on their own staffing costs.

Nods considering it really was not long ago (within my gen x lifetime). Tool use was assumed to be unique to humans. It really is starting to get harder for humanity to consider itself unique in any way.

MoHonestly, it has improved over the years.

Most distros now have dark mode installs with higher contrast. But adjustable font size and any form of text to speech during install seems missing.

Text to speech is available on most DE’s but very like windows. It is still very unintuitive for low vision rather than 0 vision use. Unfortunately, developers with no vision issues still fail to recognise speed matters in real life. And folks with limited vision tend to need the ability to only use text to speech on set text. IE the ability to enlarge most text and just speak on text we choose. Android is very good at that now. But desktop OSes still make visual impaired difficult to compete time wise with non-disabled users.

I have found it impossible to adjust menu font sizes on the vast majority of DE’s using a start like menu. Not to mention how bad the majority of more modern (fasionable) DE and application interface trends are for people needing to remember locations.

Fortunately, most Linux DE’s do have the ability to quickly magnify sections of the screen using alt and mouse scroll.

As for some applications, insistence on gray text on white or lighter gray backgrounds. Why the hell is this so darn common now. Even folks with good vision find it awful.

Seriously take the OS 3d slicing software available. Every time I install one. I takes most of a day to find out how to make anything even slightly visible. Their is absolutely no reason for it.

Hush we really do not need rabbis encouraging Israeli nternment camps to add gas chambers.

As ATM that is all Israel is missing.

The US is also in a civil war. Even if trumps opposition has not recognised it yet. Trump and his supporters are actively involved in a take over by force.

Add to that, the huge centralisation of hospital services since the 80s. Such that small town local hospitals no longer have any specialist support.

More and more services have been moved to big city hospitals where paitents from multiple towns are expected to travel.

And again elderly etc are less able to be at home ue to transportation difficulties. And complexity getting services fast.

As he did.

DHS Also has rules banning shooting at moving vehicles.

But it is very clear from the video framed from behind the victims car… During all 3 shots both his feet can be seen to the left of the car.

Killing the driver of a car heading towards you is about the dumbest way to stop a car. Even if the driver was intent on hitting a person. A dead driver is unable to take his foot of the pedal.

Also. Given the position of the windscreen bullet hole. No angle where the shooter is in the front of the car. Would he be aiming at the driver. In fact he would have to be aiming at the other ICE agent. Or the driver would have to have her head outside the window, while the videos make it clear she was not.

This was a murder. His past experience may be his motivation. But self defense clearly was not.

To rest of the world the US has started a war.

In the US congress is to embarrassed to admit they allowed him to do so. Rather then impeaching and hanging the little fucker.

Number of people with ultranationalist views rising. As 3 main parties start pushing fascist ideology. Media “acts” surprised.

A field. The thing to remember. Llangollen is unlike most canals in the UK. It is used to move water so actually has a current. Meaning way more water would be in that field then just that stored between 2 locks.

Note: This is in no way me supporting the gov. Just considering the thought process.

While the gov seems not to care about public opinion.

It seems likely drawing that conclusion and banning a well known person. May be such a bad move even Starmer was hesitant. His option likely were.

Allow her in. Knowing she will protest. At least he can jail her.

Reject her where she will still protest and have huge access to the media while explaining the UKs argument.

Real question is. If the farm is a business. Then why are farmers refusing to place the land in the LTD.

Answer because this is already taxed in a different way to non property owning businesses.

So yep farm owners are all makeing a choice. They are trying to save tax on a operational basis. And now that choice means they choose to lose the value when they die. As a LTD would be an independent entity and passed without personal taxation. Much like a trust dose.

Utter rubbish.

Officer attacking victim on the ground was attacked as a form of defence.

In no fucking way shape or form is that terrism. And in no way do police have immunity to violent attacks on protestors. do not spread your propaganda and lies using my posts.

Can’t have capatalism owned companies. Being shown up by local councils.

Come on give some care for the poor abusive billionaires.

The basic argument as put by the minister.

We can’t have corporate employees seeing council workers treated better then them.

Absolutely no comment about actual work load Vs quality of service. Just what folks not treated as well might think.

Same place he puts promises to pay his contactors.

And anyone dumb enough to continue to follow someone with such a history of broken promises.

Up his arse

Not sure they are required to have a coherent view on the solution.

As the complaint is that the prisoners are being treated like terrorists. For comiting property damage. At a time when their org was in no way classed as terrorists.

The hypocrisy of solutions is part of the point of the complaint. IE they should not be treated the way they are. So folks objecting to the treatment have zero requirement to define a solution that allows the gov to continue to treat them that way.

Put bluntly novaras claim is they demands are.

Stop calling protesters terrorist’s. Stop supporting genocide. And treat them based on the crime they committed. Property damage.

The government choice is to agree to this. Or suffer the media backlash of their actions.

The idea "Their options are let them die or force feed them”. is just a totally false statement.

Their job is to point that falsehood out. Not provide a solution that allows the gov to continue abuse.