I remember hearing someone say the additional watches were compasses or something similar for artillery, but its been too long for me to remember anything about where I heard it.
I remember hearing someone say the additional watches were compasses or something similar for artillery, but its been too long for me to remember anything about where I heard it.
This looks like a more hardware focused job listing, so if you have a typical CS background you probably lack some of the expected skills for it. Note the mentions of RTOS, embedded, hardware schematics/bring up, and ARM core knowledge.
What happened to PPB? I haven’t seen it in a while despite a ton of PPB worthy posts
I wonder if largest meant “most people in a building”?
The trick with the economics of nuclear is that building it is the main cost, once the plant is operable the cost is much lower than other sources. So by the time you have a working plant, you might as well use it to get value out of it since you have already paid for it.
Did anyone else feel like the second Act of threads was a lot weaker than the first?
The bunker part was the most interesting part after the bombs dropped, and getting to watch them more would have been more interesting than the main woman IMO.
It is not, these control rooms are rather central to the plant. If I am not mistaken this is the reactor 4 panel, and immediately to the right of this image is the original concrete sarcophagus. The plant still has electrical power for some of the monitoring stuff, and the lights are still on (at least last I knew about) for maintenance and tour groups.
Here is another angle with the lighting and concrete visible. As you can tell, the concrete on the left is not the same type as the ceiling.
The control rooms for reactors 1-3 are still in pretty decent shape, as they were operating much after the meltdown. There are also schematics available online if you want to see how these rooms are positioned within the plant.
Java/C# would have types before the variables:
double sum = 0d;
for (int i = 0; i < 4; i++)
sum += 3 * i;
The dark ages is a term for a place and time in European civilization, complaining that it doesn’t apply to other parts of the world is irrelevant. By following your argument, the Islamic Golden Age not adequately describing the conditions in Australia or the Americas means it should not be used either, when this clearly misses the point that the Islamic Golden Age focuses only on a specific part of the world during a specific time frame.