Czt if contwnt: I’m the guy who waited until his partner gave birth before telling her I knew the baby wasn’t mine. Here’s how my life is going! Aug 8, 2023

I keep getting dms asking me to update so here’s one. Been roughly 8 months. Check profile for original story.

No I don’t talk to Sarah. Screw Sarah. Haven’t seen her. Last I heard, she moved to 3 hours away with her mom to be closer to some family. I kept seeing her around town a lot so I’m beyond grateful she’s gone. She would attempt to have conversations with me sometimes in the first month after she gave birth but that soon stopped. As for Bryan, we text occasionally. And we did go out for that beer. He overall seems happy to be a father, but we don’t talk about Sarah. I don’t keep up much with him anyways. We’re both hardworking men with jobs, kids, and lives to live so it’s kinda hard to keep up. I don’t think they’re together at all but who knows.

Speaking of kids, the woman who was a single mom that I started seeing? We’re still together. Her kid is awesome and I love being her stepdad tbh. So a big middle finger to those who told me to stop talking to her or that it wasn’t gonna work. It may seem like we moved fast but, at this point, I don’t care. I’ve never loved anyone more. We communicate properly, hardly fight, just so much fun.

I initially was gonna cut all contact with her after falling off into a bad drinking habit but she really kept me grounded. I didn’t meet my stepdaughter for awhile, but when I did, I knew I couldn’t leave. Being apart of this little family has healed me in ways I literally can’t fathom.

And before anyone says I just used them to deal with the trauma of not having my own kid, that couldn’t be farther from the truth. I’m in therapy, I got my shit together, and most days I don’t even think about my ex. Hell, I even forgot about this damn account!

Words cannot describe how much my life has picked up. Thank you reddit strangers for being there in the darkest time in my life. Honestly it helped. Hoping to propose to my girlfriend sometime in the future.

That’s it! Bye.

THIS IS A REPOST SUB - I AM NOT THE OOP

DO NOT CONTACT THE OOP’s OR COMMENT ON LINKED POSTS, REMEMBER - RULE 7

Ah thanks, its hidden by default in my app so I rarley look at those. MB

Forgive me my unknowing, what does ydi stand for?

He is not disparaging the whole community. As you said “there must be zero personal powered vehicles” is not a position the community has.

You can’t say “fallacious arguments” AND “disparaging the whole community”

Only one of the two can be accurate. IMO it’s fallacious arguments, which is not a good reason to remove or ban IMHO.

The reaction to stupid arguments should be good arguments or education, not removal.

You assume a whole lot about the person, if this is the only mistake he made. Maybe its just a 15yo who seriously doesn’t understand the difference. If he has a (long) history of purposefully misunderstanding the point and derailing its a different story. If not you are banning him for a bad argument you don’t agree with. That’s absolutely power tripping reddit mod behavior.

Wrong community, did you mean AITA?

To your point though:

Tldr: IMHO you overreacted.

While i am totaly on your side regarding the abolishment of car-societies, you banned/removed someone for “direct insult” who made a comment about a general group of people.

Especially since you (and most people on the sub) don’t even argue for the point he is making fun of, this is clearly no direct insult against any particular person.

While his comment IS stupid (IMHO) and IS a strawman argument (so doesn’t add anything to discussion but rather steer towards a direction I find non-constructive) It IS also clearly a hyperbol and IS clearly NOT directly insulting a particular person.

So even if I share your annoyment regarding such people, I think you went full reddit mode and abused your powers. Just my humble opinion, feel free to disagree

While I find it legitimate to ban people who repeatedly only derail and insult for the fun of it, I don’t think banning people not getting the point or using graphic language fosters a good discussion culture or gets anyone to change their views or educate themself but just leads to a circle jerk. The point when to assume someone is acting in bad faith is not easy to define, but especially if this is a oneoff its definitely not reached in my opinion.

While you can mod your sub this way, I don’t think it helps for reaching our goal and its not the moderation I would like to see.

judgment: PTH(uman)

“Lost its radio signal” As if we didn’t have footage of them jamming

“Blockade to avoid weapon delivery”

“Ship carrying humanitarian aid”

“These antisemitic flotilla”

"The IDF prepared in advance to intercept the ship before it could enter Israeli territorial waters; "

Enough said

13, aber nicht von sonnig sondern von logische Technik für meinen personellen rechner

Installiert twrp then lineage for your device. Usually there is a guide with the packet on the lineage Website.

If not officialy supported you need to pray someone on xda tinkered a Version together

Me ( an addicted smoker ) : THIS!

Interesting. Was ich aus dem wiki Artikel noch nicht so ganz verstehe, ist warum die elektromagnetische Strahlung hier einen impuls überträgt wenn sie keine Masse hat. Klar, die Energie muss irgendwo hin, aber bei einer absorbtion bzw. Reflektion einer masselosen Strahlung hätte meine (möglicherweise naive) intuition gesagt diese kann nur wieder in Form von elektromagnetischer Strahlung (reflektion) oder Wärme (absorbtion) erfolgen.

Warum hier plötzlich kinetische Energie vorkommt, raffe ich nicht.

Ein anderer Kommentator sprach an, dass elektromagnetische Strahlung nur keine Ruhe Masse hat (und impliziert damit dass sie eine andere Form der Masse hat), da sie sich aber immer mit Lichtgeschwindigkeit ausbreitet und nie zur Ruhe kommt, verschiebt dass das Problem aber nur darauf, dass dass maimai von einer rein hypothetischen masselosigkeit spricht die nirgendwo außer auf dem Papier tatsächlich existiert, und dass etwas ohne Masse bei der Kollision trotzdem einen impuls generiert, was natürlich möglich ist, aber ohne eine Erklärung warum dies der Fall sein sollte eine unbefriedigende Antwort bleibt.

Danke für diese Erklärung, leider reicht mein Physik Lk wissen von vor 10jahren hier nicht mehr aus um mitzukommen und bei mir bleibt hängen “ich mag deine lustigen Worte, magischer Mann”

Der unterschied von Ruhemasse und anderer Masse (?) war mir nicht geläufig, vlt. Finde ich da bei Gelegenheit mal ein gut gemachtes erklärvideo oder so.

Ich glaube mit tatsächlichen Argumenten zu argumentieren ist immer besser als zu sagen “berühmte Person XY sagt ich hab recht”. Letzteres wird weder jemanden überzeugen, noch zu einer guten Diskussionskultur führen

Die Erklärung macht sehr klar was hier gemeint ist. Welcher Mensch das sagt, macht diese sehr klare Aussage nicht richtiger oder falscher

Argument um ad hominum sind scheinargumente.

Auch wenn ich Einstein wirklich hoch achte und seine Meinung viele parallelen zu meiner hat, bleibt ein autoriatätsargument ein scheinargument.

Aussgagen sind wahr oder falsch und hilfreich oder nicht aufgrund ihres Inhalts, nicht aufgrund ihres Autors.

Ich beschreibe mich als materialistischen Dialektiker, weil es eine wahrhaft gutes Modell gesellschaftlicher Verhältnisse ist, nicht weil Marx gesagt hat, dass materialistische Dialektik gut ist.

Wer es als Argument benutzt dass Marx, Einstein o.ä. etwas gesagt hat, hat kritisches denken nicht verstanden und steckt immer noch im autoritären Charakter fest, zu dem er in unserer Welt sozialisiert wurde.

OP ist wondering if the/a meme is just poorly edited OR AI generated because this matters for whether he should get angry or not…

Pretty straight forward in my mind (Or used as in “is A true OR is B true?” - "if A is true --> don’t get angry ; if B is true --> get angry)

Its used like: “are you taller than 150cm or smaller than 150cm? Its an important question because it determines if you are allowed to ride this rolercoster OR not”

Spoken language “or” is different from programming “or”, where in the latter it could mean if either a or b is true, --> get angry AND not get angry. This is not how it is used here though.

I don’t understand. What is this comment saying? Sure one gets angry AFTER on has a reason to be. The meme points to the fact, that it is often times hard to check, if the image is ai OR if it is just poorly edited. What is there not to understand?

How about being against Imperialists as well as fascists but not calling an attempt to divide the working class by skin color in some f*ed up version of positive racism “based”? Ever heard of the concept of international solidarity?

Hab 1 Schlaganfall begommen nur vong lesen her

Ranzy: Schreibt gern geschehen, weigert sich zu elaborieren, verlässt