

If the ICC had real teeth, there would be guides like that for American soldiers as well. The reason that there are none doesn’t mean the US military is not committing large scale crimes against humanity.
If the ICC had real teeth, there would be guides like that for American soldiers as well. The reason that there are none doesn’t mean the US military is not committing large scale crimes against humanity.
tbf I‘m glad it doesn’t only happen to people from poor countries
Thank you for the through explanation! That was very helpful
Could you explain why this is bad? Software patents aren’t a great thing, are they?
The problem is likely the many references to the Durban Conference: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Conference_against_Racism_2001
From the article:
NGO repudiations of the NGO Forum’s Declaration
Several NGOs, including Human Rights Watch, Amnesty International, and the Lawyers Committee for Human Rights, disassociated themselves from the language of the NGO Forum’s Declaration that dealt with Israel and with Jews.[5][26] The Palestinian Solidarity Committee of South Africa reportedly distributed copies of the antisemitic forgery The Protocols of the Elders of Zion.[27]
It’s a bitch to use with 1Password. I didn’t experience downsides otherwise so far.
Just don’t do it in Germany or you’ll end up paying a lot more
Yourjokebutworse
More like rare bill burr w
I now see the following: „Gulf of Mexico (Gulf of America)“
I’m in Europe. Yes, there’s a version per country (or at least there are multiple versions), but this change is also made for places that will continue to call it Gulf of Mexico. Its annoying.
While reading your comment I was wondering if you’re working for the company I’m working for. So many similarities.
But there are no promotions on our firm, so no.
Take a few days rest, mate. It’s not worth it.
I’ve never heard that before in my life
Congratulations! Same here!
Yeah, that sounds totally not made up by somebody trying to discredit the left ;)
What I don’t get about seedboxes: you give the provider both your personal data as well as show them what you’re doing illegally. That seems like a bad idea. What am I missing?
What does it do? Could you explain?
Did you read the article?
Breaking up monopolies is a good thing, and Google arguably holds too much power. Chromium is being used in 70% of browsers, and the decision how to implement and develop web standards are all in the hand of one for profit company, which had little interest in keeping things open and accessible (and private).
A quote from this Register article sums it up nicely:
What we are forced to assume in turn is that Chrome is built by the professional developers working for an ad agency with the primary goal of building a web browser that serves the needs of other professional developers working for the ad agency’s prospective clients.
This is a joke. Have you considered the possibility that you are the stupid person in this case?