Ah fuck, you are right.

I parsed it differently and changed the meaning of “dates” mid-sentence, which one shouldn’t do when reading.

They have been ripping people out of cars, leaving the cars running, once even in gear. Fuck these fuckers.

General Strike tomorrow in MN. Consider not shopping, going to school, or work tomorrow as well wherever you are.

Yes. I cannot force people to read, but I can ensure (but I won’t actually follow through) that criticisms are readable to those with poor reading skills, and those that do not read English.

I think they were implying you don’t have to pay for dates…

If college is just a certificate needed to get the good jobs, then this makes a lot of sense.
If college is there for learning, then it is terrible.

I bet there is a difference in the ratios between degrees on these. (i.e. Civil Engineering versus Marketing)

That’s why your Dad and/or Mom couldn’t get laid.

Thank you! I was shocked to not find it locally.

Looking forward to the day The Beaverton and The Onion starting doing normal news. “Yeah, they used to do satire, then the world went crazy and comedians are the only truth tellers. So now they give the facts with context, but in a fun way.”

OP needs a new therapist using a different therapy style. Keep trying folks. (I have my favorites, but so does everyone.)

You are not lazy. Only competing interests and needs make people appear lazy to those using a narrow focus.

A link to Wikipedia entry about a book which spends many pages developing the idea and does a much better job than I ever could. Your local library likely has a copy. (I am being weird to avoid being an advertisement.)

Not OP, but random human.

Glad you tried the “YOLO Wikipeida”, and are sharing that fact as it saves the rest of us time. :)

Ah shit! Great point!

Yeah. Seems someone needs to be taking criticism of $obvious_bad_thing, and translating it into other languages and reading levels.

Edit: My initial reply was of poor quality. I skipped half of you thoughtful comment, AND I misunderstood your meaning as well. I apologize.

I think you are correct about your interpretation of their current policy. However, their old policy would have allowed for checking on users. The old policy is one reason my old company disallowed the usage of OpenAI, as corporate secrets could easily be gathered by OpenAI. (The paranoid among use suspected that was the reason for releasing such a buggy AI.)

I agree. I think training a depressing detector to flag problematic conversations for human review is a good idea.

That is a really great image.

Yes. Even if the government of the USA does nothing, there will be negative impacts. The population that survives may migrate north or south. Warlords will strike out for new territories. Anything still created or grown in the USA will no longer be. Billionaires will flee to the nicer parts of the world to repeat the process. Wealth in the American stock markets will do something.

Your family will end up doing most of the cleaning. Your landlord will hire low wage people to do any remaining.
Please reconsider.

POWERFULLY!

If we discount the “landing of boats”, then who gets to sell the land the documents could have been based on?

Opens? OpenAI spent years doing exactly that. Though, apparently they almost three years ago.

https://www.maginative.com/article/openai-clarifies-its-data-privacy-practices-for-api-users/

Previously, data submitted through the API before March 1, 2023 could have been incorporated into model training. This is no longer the case since OpenAI implemented stricter data privacy policies.

Inputs and outputs to OpenAI’s API (directly via API call or via Playground) for model inference do not become part of the training data unless you explicitly opt in.