Probably an emerald spoon in his case.

you’re a good person

Every time I hear “Swamp thing” I think about this wonderful song… Please…enjoy: https://youtu.be/r6XFX7vP8i8

but if you sell your account you can get hundred of dollars! That’s upwards of $9 a year of pure profit.

undefined> This will only further the “5 Mods Control 92 Of The Top 500 Subs” issue and lead to overall less happy, less engaged users.

With that many subs, they couldn’t be good mods even if they wanted to. It is truly only a power trip and badge collecting at that point.

It’s like bragging that they’re the CEO of 3 companies…ok so you’re doing a terrible job managing 3 companies instead of trying to do good at 1.

I made a detailed reply here about how the infinite set theory to the OOP. I don’t know how to tag you, so here’s a link

Yes! There’s actually two facets to consider:

1. Infinities can be countable or uncountable:

   • The set of integers is a countable infinity. This is pretty obvious, since you can easily count from one member to the next.

   • The set of irrational numbers is an uncountable infinity. This is because if I give you one member, you can’t give me an objectively “next” one. There’s infinitely many choices.

     Example: I say what’s the next member of the set of irrational numbers after 1.05? Well, there’s 1.050001, 1.056, etc.

2. Can a member of an infinite set be mapped to a corresponding member of another infinite set? And if so, how?

   Spoiler, there are three different ways: surjective, injective, and bijective.

In this situation, the sets are both countable. QA can open bug #1, bug #2, etc. It’s also - for now - at least a surjective mapping of Starfield bugs -> Skyrim bugs. Because they’re both countable, for each bug in Starfield you can find at least one bug in Skyrim (because it’s a known bigger set at the moment).

But we don’t know more than that right now.