Assuming each user will always encrypt to the same value, this still loses to statistical attacks.
As a simple example, users are e.g. more likely to vote on threads they comment in. With data reaching back far enough, people who exhibit “normal” behavior will be identified with high certainty.
In my experience, it is good at simple to medium complexity regex. For the harder ones it starts being quite useless though, at best providing a decent starting point to begin debugging from.
There was a scandal about her sleeping with six (not five) other officers, sometimes while on-duty (while being married herself).
If you’re talking about the base image, it’s sort of real.
The player is YouTuber Max Fosh and it was a charity football event. However the incident (as far as we know) was not scripted and he actually tried hard to get a yellow card just to be able to pull off this stunt. You could probably find the video he made on it by searching “Max Fosh yellow card”.
A pyramid is built bottom to top, not top to bottom. That’s also one of the strengths of the ISO format. You can add/remove layers for arbitrary granularity and still have a valid date.
It is dead AND alive before you check and collapses into dead XOR alive when you check.
But yes, the short description also irked me a little. It’s really hard to write it concisely without leaving out important bits (like we both did too).
We can do that with the first sentence and flip it into German, replacing “lighter” with “fireworks”. We get:
“Sie dürfen die Feuerarbeiten nicht mit in die Luftebene nehmen.”
A lot of German speaking communities online do translate English loanwords into German words, often with the intention to create this funny effect.
13/13 Vehicle with Crew 2 that costs one mana to cast
That’s gotta be Death’s Shadow but as a Vehicle, right?
That’s a very optimistic view. Not licencing your patent to your competition is absolutely a profit driven decision that harms the end user.
There’s even a word for that called scurryfunging.
It was always meant to become a free game just like it’s predecessor. This is just that transition.
Labor of Love award is specifically for older games that are still seeing love from the devs. I’d argue with them releasing a DLC of such quality that many people wondered if a DLC could win game of the year it deserves the nomination too.
Re LLM summaries: I’ve noticed that too. For some of my classes shortly after the ChatGPT boom we were allowed to bring along summaries. I tried to feed it input text and told it to break it down into a sentence or two. Often it would just give a short summary about that topic but not actually use the concepts described in the original text.
Also minor nitpick but be wary of the term “accuracy”. It is a terrible metric for most use cases and when a company advertises their AI having a high accuracy they’re likely hiding something. For example, let’s say we wanted to develop a model that can detect cancer on medical images. If our test set consists of 1% cancer inages and 99% normal tissue the 99% accuracy is achieved trivially easy by a model just predicting “no cancer” every time. A lot of the more interesting problems have class imbalances far worse than this one too.
AI can be good but I’d argue letting an LLM autonomously write a paper is not one of the ways. The risk of it writing factually wrong things is just too great.
To give you an example from astronomy: AI can help filter out “uninteresting” data, which encompasses a large majority of data coming in. It can also help by removing noise from imaging and by drastically speeding up lengthy physical simulations, at the cost of some accuracy.
None of those use cases use LLMs though.
The reason they chose Antarctica is because the most often used flat earth model* has Antarctica as a ring on the “rim”.
They usually do acknowledge a 24h sun in the north existing based on that model because it would require the sun to remain central over the disc, which is geometrically not really an issue. However the southern 24h sun is not possible with that model. (Edit: Excluding some weird lensing effects or multiple suns, like some of them claim)
*Most of them will tell you they don’t have a model, because they don’t really know what “model” means.
Source: I watched too many SciManDan videos.
Sorta. The function height(angle) needs to be continuous. From there it’s pretty clear why it works if you know the mean value theorem.
Indeed. Did you more or less know that or did you challenge yourself to a round of impromptu geoguessr?
It didn’t play the animation for me (only the comments made me realize it was meant to be animated).
Him just standing there NOT dancing made this so much more funny and relatable to me.