• 23 Posts
  • 425 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 8th, 2023

help-circle
















  • @DrDominate@lemmy.world Gave a very thorough explanation already, so I will just add some additional bits.

    World of Warcraft had a lot of “expansions” over the years, which change the game in some very basic ways and sometimes even remove old content and Blizzard doesn’t keep every expansion online at the same time, there are like “phases”. For example right now you can play Classic/Era (no expansion), Cataclysm (third expansion), and War Within (latest expansion, aka retail). But some time ago there were servers for TBC (first expansion) and WotLK (second expansion), which by now have transitioned to Cataclysm (third expansion), and those will progress to MoP (fourth expansion) sometime later this year.

    There is something to be said for trying the content chronologically, i.e. starting with Classic/Era, but with the release model Blizzard uses progressing “historically” is hardly possible on the official servers. There are however unofficial servers which can facilitate this to a degree (using them might be considered illegal though depending on your jurisdiction, but AFAIK nobody ever got punished for playing on them, only for hosting).

    I’d ignore Hardcore and Seasons of Discovery until you know a bit more what you are doing, as they are modifications to the original.

    Whichever expansion you choose, you will want to look into user made UI modifications, which are referred to as “addons”. E.g. for the missing quest markers on the map in Classic/Era you can find addons that add them.


  • Wie meinen? Meine Lesung ist das Frau Professor die Ungleichbehandlung super geil findet, und das sagt Sie an mehreren Stellen explizit:

    Ist die Tatsache, dass es keine Wehrpflicht für Frauen gibt, also als ausgleichende Gerechtigkeit zu verstehen – für all die “gender gaps” zum Beispiel?

    Ich möchte das so verstanden wissen. Rechtlich ist der Artikel aber so nicht ausgetestet.

    Sie haben in Ihrem Artikel im Verfassungsblog im vergangenen Jahr eine allgemeine Dienstpflicht gefordert. Als Abschlussfrage: Wie würde Ihrer Meinung nach eine gerechte allgemeine Dienstpflicht aussehen?

    So, dass nur Männer zur Wehrpflicht und ergänzend zur allgemeinen Dienstpflicht herangezogen werden. Ich finde, dass Frauen da komplett rausgehalten werden sollten.

    Dein Vorposter wies hingegen darauf hin das die Ungleichbehandlung der Geschlechter in Artikel 12a ja bereits einmal vom Europäischen Gerichtshof als unzulässig eingestuft wurde. Das war zwar im Bezug auf das Dienstverbot für Frauen (Absatz 4), nicht auf die Wehrpflicht (Absatz 1), aber es stünde ja zu erwarten das auch diese Ungleichbehandlung kippen würde wenn dagegen mal jemand klagte.




  • Must be some setting on your end, I’m getting offered translations on that page as well (stable release).

    Two things I could think of, either you haven’t set it to always offer translations or your browser is set to simplified Chinese.

    Another thing, you can select some text, right-click the selection, and there will be a translation option there. After you used that there will be a button for “translate the whole page” in the translation popup.

    Oh also you can download more languages through the settings (general settings page, right below browser language).


  • The viral interpretation of Kratsios’s comment reflects the growing impact of social media in framing public understanding of government messaging.

    While the White House has not issued a formal clarification, the speech’s wording suggests the phrase was metaphorical—intended to refer to the transformative nature of modern innovation, not literal manipulation of space-time, or the invention of time travel.

    Look who’s talking about “framing” with a fucking headline like that. Damn clickbait, and doesn’t even provide the context that suggests the sentence is metaphorical… It’s not the Onion, but it’s not journalism either.