

The other shots I did are even more confusing, I picked the one that seemed to be the most comprehensible…


The other shots I did are even more confusing, I picked the one that seemed to be the most comprehensible…


Location is in Germany.
So maximum hospital bill for someone with standard insurance is 10€ per day.
Wouldn’t jump because of that…


hospitals cannot be profitable, they are a social good, we fund them as a society
l live in Germany, a country with universal healthcare, so basically we do exactly that.
So perhaps “profitability” is the wrong word here.
But funds are still limited, and if the authorities determine that the money is used less efficient in one place than in another, they will consolidate and close the first place (that’s happening for the hospital in the picture).
We have reached, or even passed the limits of that aproach, though.
Doctors and hospitals have to be realistically reachable for people and not a 100km away after all…


l am surprised that the hospital, being halfway closed because of non-profitability anyway, had enough funds left somewhere to even install the nets.
A new elevator would probably have cost more than the whole building complex is worth by now…


Naturally there are also several elevators at the place.
But you must have other routes for exit that are easily available in the case of an emergency.
Also many people aren’t especially fond of elevators (me included).


It’s the first hospital where I’ve seen something like this, though.
I can just guess that there must have been some kind of incident at that place that triggered the installation of the safety nets.


Maximum drop distance at any point is less than 2m.
You will survive…


That’s one interpretation… ;-)


It’s in the article:
Programmes like the European Space Agency’s Moonlight are planning to launch a network of satellites around the Moon to provide continuous and reliable communication coverage in the future.


“co.uk” TLD … I assumed it to be a British site?


Here we are, in a strange world where I have to count fucking a*******s to find out, if the P***S said “bitches” or “bastards” in his latest social media post. Or wait, maybe he said “butchers”, or perhaps “bollards”…
It’s a god-damned direct quote and the distinction what the asshole in the W***e H***e exactly said is kinda important.
So why is something like this censored on a news site?


Mine was the first Falcon game!
Also, my first Linux distro in 1997 came on CD and had a nice Linux introduction book l still used as a quick reference years after l had moved on to newer releases.


l am pretty sure he talks about pre-online times (which were also largely pre-home-console times).
The instruction manual of my first bought game, a flight simulator on the Atari ST, was basically a printed pilot crash course.
I also had some thick copied instruction folders from the more… unconventional acquired games, often because the copy protection was like: “Enter the 5th word of the 13th line on page 54!”.
Ich hab das zwar noch nicht probiert, aber alles wird besser mit Apfelmus, also…: 😋
Zu lange zu nahe am Saarland gewohnt - Ich fürchte, ich bin unwiederbringlich verloren… ;-)


Great. Just wonderful.
Now even the back of the Moon has a better internet connection than my home town in rural Germany.
Speaking as someone who has been living in towns with rivers for most of my life:
This is the way.
My experience clearly says that you will loose orientation and get confused the moment you go to a district that is not alligned with the riverbank.


Why would you go to the effort of creating an AI photo like this, when you could just take the photo yourself?
At a guess: the creator is missing one minor required component for that approach, like e.g. having Sabrina Carpenter standing in his bathroom… ;-)
Ja.
Mit “t” ist komplett sinnentstellend.