

https://jitsi.org/ ticks both boxes.


https://jitsi.org/ ticks both boxes.
The example does not allow for zipcodes from other countries, but pretends to allow multiple countries.


This is misleading, there is no investigation. They just review some additional documents flagged by the public. So the strategy now is to release documents only when their existence can no longer be denied.
I read the comment to only refer to the way AI was used.


Maybe they think that when those people cannot find new jobs beer sales will rise again?


If I say I have notes on powerful people and say that empowers me, that’s bragging. Not blackmail, because those people might not even know. If I were to say it to those powerful people, it could be perceived as threatening. But it’s not blackmail, as I don’t demand anything. If I were to use those notes to get something done: that’s blackmail.


The NYT is just reporting what’s ‘fit to print’. Unless there’s verified proof of actual blackmail this description seems apt. Saying you have information on people and you may use it is not blackmail, as that would require a direct request.
The key is for a virtual machine as you can see in the picture.
As you can see in the top right corner the person of the year title applies to the architects of AI.

Just before the bubble bursts.

Coronavirus is not mentioned, but had some impact on the travel industry as well.


Is this a joke?


When you read the article, it’s just that there is an appeal that’s unlikely to get picked up. Headline seems a bit hysterical.

Dated: Jul 22, 2025 at 07:56am EDT


Reminds me of this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tobacco_smoke_enema


The speaker will not become president unless Vance and Trump become incapacitated at the same time. When just Trump becomes incapacitated, they can choose a new vice president.
Agree, but if you live next to a highway, zero emissions means you’ll be healthier. So in that way the label makes sense.

That sounds like a tariff with extra steps.
Probably in the time lotus was released people would use it for relatively simple calculations involving dates that would not go that far back. So this bug would not be a problem for those uses and go undetected for some time. Or maybe it even was a deliberate choice to improve performance since the creator would consider it unlikely to use dates decades away.