This is misleading, there is no investigation. They just review some additional documents flagged by the public. So the strategy now is to release documents only when their existence can no longer be denied.

https://youtu.be/jaTW30Yyhog

I read the comment to only refer to the way AI was used.

Maybe they think that when those people cannot find new jobs beer sales will rise again?

If I say I have notes on powerful people and say that empowers me, that’s bragging. Not blackmail, because those people might not even know. If I were to say it to those powerful people, it could be perceived as threatening. But it’s not blackmail, as I don’t demand anything. If I were to use those notes to get something done: that’s blackmail.

The NYT is just reporting what’s ‘fit to print’. Unless there’s verified proof of actual blackmail this description seems apt. Saying you have information on people and you may use it is not blackmail, as that would require a direct request.

The key is for a virtual machine as you can see in the picture.

As you can see in the top right corner the person of the year title applies to the architects of AI.

Just before the bubble bursts.

Coronavirus is not mentioned, but had some impact on the travel industry as well.

Is this a joke?

When you read the article, it’s just that there is an appeal that’s unlikely to get picked up. Headline seems a bit hysterical.

Dated: Jul 22, 2025 at 07:56am EDT

Reminds me of this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tobacco_smoke_enema

The speaker will not become president unless Vance and Trump become incapacitated at the same time. When just Trump becomes incapacitated, they can choose a new vice president.

Agree, but if you live next to a highway, zero emissions means you’ll be healthier. So in that way the label makes sense.

That sounds like a tariff with extra steps.

Vegans do have friends that may not be vegan. Eating out with those friends might take them to a restaurant with a vegan friendly menu instead of a fully vegan restaurant.

The announcement states it’s a new product.

Nytimes says basically the same: “In fact, it would be hard to imagine an event that could have gone better from the point of view of the Russian leader, who made no public commitment to stop his assault on Ukraine and yet was treated as a valued friend. Mr. Trump did not fault Mr. Putin for starting the brutal war and left without mentioning the sanctions that just hours earlier he had threatened to impose if there were no deal.”