Rekall Incorporated

Rekall is a company that provides memory implants of vacations, where a client can take a memory trip to a certain planet and be whoever they desire.

  • 526 Posts
  • 86 Comments
Joined 4 months ago
cake
Cake day: August 16th, 2024

help-circle
  • This is really not good if as a consumer you are looking for competition in the semiconductor fab space. Not that I expect any concern about consumers from Samsung or Intel (or the clients of their fabs), but less players in a market is always a bad thing. Even if all we get are the scraps (in context of the price benefits of a hypothetical competitive environment in semiconductor fabs).

    That being said, this might be mostly speculation from the Korean media.

































  • Market share table:

    Here is how Hyperion Research carved up the on premises HPC server market for 2023, including a revision that brought in HPC machines made by Supermicro and other non-traditional suppliers:

    Those non-traditional suppliers, who are by and large building “AI supercomputers,” as a group have a little more than a quarter of the market, and HPE has the dominant market share at just a little under a quarter – thanks in large part to the massive deals taken down by Cray to build pre-exascale systems in the United States and Europe and exascale machines in the United States.








  • Overall, we think this is a relatively positive update on the burn-in front after 9 months of heavy static content usage, or around 2,000 to 2,300 hours of total use. As we saw in the previous update, there are visible signs of burn-in on our panel, but the level of degradation between 6 months and 9 months has been relatively minimal.

    As things stand, burn-in is not having a significant impact on our daily usage of this monitor, and it’s close to, though not quite, a non-issue. We can spot the burn-in in some edge case applications with large uniform areas of dark grey, but it’s pretty uncommon and rarely distracting. We think that’s a pretty good result given we’re stressing the crap out of this display, using it in absolutely the worst-case realistic scenario you could think of, and our usage patterns equate to displaying eight hours of virtually static content every single day.

    It’s too bad it’s somewhat difficult to identify the burn-in impact via screenshots. IMO it’s something that you need to experience during usage to evaluate. The review is also not here or there. Burn-in is noticeable, but seems to be not that big of an issue.

    Still, what will burn-in be like after 2-3 years if we are already seeing issues after 6 to 9 months (albeit under worst case scenario type usage).