• 30 Posts
  • 1.76K Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 8th, 2023

help-circle












  • The one that stands out in my memory is the time that I interviewed with the owner of a small, retail business, who was an out, gay man. (It’s relevant.) When I got there, I noticed that all of the employees were 6’+, blond boys. I’m neither of those things. Immediately, he did The Look, and I knew it was over, but I still had to go through the motions of the interview.

    (The Look consists of looking you up and down, and then peering into the empty space over your head, as if imagining the tall man that they want to see instead.)


  • Here’s the hitch:

    It is a literal yet unfortunate fact that we must hold our noses and vote for anyone who stands a chance at beating a Republican in a national presidential election. Until such time as the parties have been taken over by people who wouldn’t nominate someone like that.

    This strategy guarantees that the parties will keep nominating someone like that. (After all, they keep winning.) There’s no mechanism for replacing the party leadership in it, nor any realistic scenario by which it would happen.




  • Please adapt this comment to a post in !YouShouldKnow@lemmy.world to reach a bigger audience. It’s a truth that everybody Should Know.

    A lot of people know that the conservative mind runs on fear and disgust. A friend years ago clued me into the key bit of insight that merges this observation with the “I’m a good person” ethic into a Grand Unified Theory of the conservative mindset: Underneath it all is a deep self-disgust. They fear more than anything else that they are not good people, and hence subscribe to an ethic which axiomatically says that they are. But somebody who truly believes that they are a good person could sit quietly at home in an aura of smugness. (Which, to be brutally honest, we can all probably think of some leftists like that.) The conservative, who doesn’t believe it deep down, has to have it constantly demonstrated.

    And that explains everything about the performative cruelty that they go nuts for.

    The example that perhaps makes this dynamic most obvious is the deeply-closeted, evangelical Christian, homosexual men. But, everything they do comes back to this truth. Like: “re-open Alcatraz” -> “exaggerated, symbolic vengeance against criminals” -> “performative cruelty against bad people” -> “performed by good people” -> “I’m a good person”.


  • That’s the problem with the 2-party system, isn’t it? One party can decide to be objectively terrible, and the other party discovers that it only needs to be ever-so-slightly better, because what are the 66% gonna do— vote for the greater evil?! And there’s a lot of personal benefit to the party insiders to be had! Trouble is, when the margin between the two parties is so small, electoral fuckery by the terrible party, and stochastic events mean that they sometimes win.

    Which seems awfully familiar.


  • First off, I’m not an expert, I’m just a guy who poured mold-making silicone gel on the deck of my boat a couple of days ago, in order to capture the surface detail to re-create it after making repairs. The cured mold is definitely the same sort of rubbery feel as the gel wrist rest I’ve owned, just firmer. According to the ScienceDirect article, the basics are all the same: It’s a matrix of loosely-linked silicone elastomer molecules, but the final product can vary a lot depending on the amount of cross-linking, and the amount of fluid infused in the matrix. That ultra-soft product that you linked, like the mold-making stuff that I used, probably has dyes in it for user-friendliness. (To know when you’ve mixed the two parts thoroughly.) That means the product won’t be clear. Also, I think the wrist rests may have some sort of polymer (vinyl?) outer layer for durability. That would make it look a little different.