To me, it sounds like you are expressing that you think that the “regular” Palestinians are supportive of Hamas.

Have you considered that they tell her to shut up because they don’t want her to make herself the target of Hamas?

I think even the most clueless non American can figure out that someone deciding that they don’t want to do a public office before the election of that public office is hardly undemocratic and while I am not clueless, I am a non American and live with non Americans. I think I can guessimate that.

I worked in a office supplier at one point. People would enter the office, put some documents on the first desk they see and look at the guy sitting there. No hello… No sentence… Nothing… That is usually the point when we knew what was up. The guy would look at the documents and say "you aren’t at the right place. Wrong floor. Wrong door. " They would look at us in shock. Sometimes complain that you couldn’t tell where you are. It was always the same. They wanted to get something from the government. They had an office in the same building. There were multiple big sign. There was literally 2 signs outside telling you which floor. Obviously our office had a sign too. They passed at least 3 signs in an office building while they were looking where to go… People don’t read signs… They just don’t.

I could be wrong but I think it runs on boot. So it would loop into bsod.

I don’t want to argue with you and I admit that my phrasing wasn’t ideal but I assumed that it was obvious that i was talking about everything that would be executed on the machine. Apparently it wasn’t.

Well do you want to have Microsoft approving EVERY driver for windows? Rip 3rd party open source drivers for retro hardware

There are people called Sam and not Samantha. There are Matts that aren’t Matthews. There are Joes that aren’t Joseph.

Maybe don’t be a Richard?

Basically, crowdstrike wrote bad code that run as a driver, windows doesn’t like bad code in their drivers. Kernel level code is generally expected to run properly. crowdstrike’s kernel level code was really bad. Embarrassingly bad.

If the host creates a playlist and everyone can add their favorite song to the playlist, the host won’t be blamed if you add “erika”. People rightfully think you are an ignorant weirdo or a bad person, not the host.

I don’t think it is relevant.

The xkcd points out distribution and population.

The second map highlights how much more democratic the us is than republican and that is it obviously a broken system that republican’s have a chance of winning

To be fair there is more than 1 definition.

I think it is fairly obvious that the “inventor” of the paradox of tolerance didn’t use the term with the meaning that it is self-contradicting and therefore wrong but rather the alternative definition of “a statement that is seemingly contradictory or opposed to common sense and yet is perhaps true”. And the peace treaty/social contract solution is assuming that you can’t be tolerant to the intolerant, so they agree on “yet is perhaps true” part. And the first section is obviously true.

The paradox is about being “obliged” to be intolerant to protect (and maximize) the tolerance.

If you don’t actively act against intolerance, you allow the intolerance to exist, allowing intolerance will result in more intolerance.

I don’t know what your issue with the paradox of tolerance is. Even in your “solution” it is ultimately true that there is the paradox of tolerance.

The paradox is that a maximally tolerant society has to be intolerant to the intolerant.

Breaking the social contract would make you intolerant and the tolerant people who follow the social contract would have to be intolerant towards you to protect the social contract as just removing the necessity of tolerance towards the intolerant wouldn’t create a deterrent as the tolerant people mostly would treat the intolerant decently as they aren’t bad people and wouldn’t inflict unnecessary harm. So you need to communicate to the tolerant people that they have to be intolerant towards the intolerant to protect the social contract, so the tolerant would inflict the necessary harm to the intolerant to create a deterrent.

So to maximize the effects of the social contract, the social contract would require intolerance from the tolerant.

To be fair, it is a good method to not hear his bs

People who joke like that are disgusting.

I don’t care who you are, if your best option is suicide, we failed you and we should be sorry.

Don’t know what idea I like more,

1. He is doing the weirdest troll
2. He is mistaken
3. We are mistaken to think that he means Epstein and he is totally right and on the money. (Geoff made have a vacation love Affair with his wife or something)

I can’t choose

I have no issue with what you said. I am just not sure if you are misunderstanding what they mean with “find on the internet” or if I do. But that is pointless to argue about.

Please don’t tell “manual laborers” that they can’t lose their job. That might not be accurate long term (think, auto industry or 3d printed houses) but also it turns the working class against each other. “It isn’t my issue, I am a manual laborers” wouldn’t a position that other laborer would like and it is wrong because who is going to support all those jobless people… What will they be doing? Maybe working in manual labor???

OpenAI scrape (illegally, in my humble opinion) the internet and trained chatgpt on it. That sounds to me what they are saying. Where is the issue?

The difference is quite big too. A Wyoming vote is apparently currently worth 2.87 times the average American’s vote. So probably like 5 times the most worthless vote…

Still missing the point. I am in favor of non violent solutions.