I won’t argue about the value of explanation from a lying hallucinating machine.

But I like how your use case is “it does the things that I believe to be useless and time wasting for everyone involved. But instead of, pushing for the end of these time wasting acts, I waste a little less time with llms (instead of all of the time by not doing these time wasting acts) while still wasting the time of the reader.” What an efficient use case! We should violate IP law, waste drinking water and energy for it!

Using llms for math questions is probably the worst usage for llms.

And all of this is easily calculated without ai. You can literally google it and let google do the math for you without ai.

Past tense. You can’t change the past. Checkmate!

I will change it to “tagged a person who ate raw pasta until they vomited” then we don’t need to update each other :)

Corrected.

Now I have 1 user tagged as “tags users with strange stories”.

The tech industry is effectively exclusively based in IP law, but to create LLMs they felt comfortable to completely ignore IP laws, and they will sue you if you would break IP law that favors them.

I think you are right and yet so wrong.

My problems with ai aren’t unique and I am no special snowflake who see through the matrix while everyone else is distracted. I am just a dude. I really doubt that the points tell I will bring up, is anything boring as generic arguments against ai.

My problem with data theft is not based on the concern that artists has the rights on their work. I want them rewarded for your labor but in this case, it is not my primary issue. It is the hypocritical nature of company entirely based in IP law stealing IP protected work. I hate that the system is not ripping them into piece like Nintendo rips an online super smash tournament into pieces. It is so obviously “rules for thee, not for me”. You can claim that capitalism is causing that but I really don’t think capitalism requires this shit. Sure the rich and powerful are rich and powerful in capitalism because of capitalism, but special pledging for the elite existed in every system we have tried.

I hate ai because people invest in the dumbest applications for it. LLM are trash. Voice cloner??? Wtf. Image generation? Why?? But for medical applications in which we have comparably amazing clean data, let’s invest into that a little bit. But x billions into LLMs please.

I hate ai because the most brain dead application gets the most usage and people will tell you how it is bad but use it anyway. Then they obviously don’t have the computing power to run a decent local model and just pipe any personal or confidential information into the online service that tells you that the data will be used for training, so it can be leaking back out to other people.

I hate ai because it is literally everything bad about society (e.g. nonconsental nudes) and tech (e.g. data collectors) and their interaction.

There was a case in which a monkey took a picture and the owner of the camera wanted to publish the photo. Peta sued and lost because an animal can’t hold any copyright as an human author is required for copyright.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monkey_selfie_copyright_dispute

As you also find in the wikipedia article, this case is used to argue that ai generated content is not by an human author and consequently not copyrightable.

Tbh I haven’t watched a single super bowl ever. So i didn’t care to watch the halftime show either. I just looked up how long the show was.

Lady gaga being part of it makes even funnier.

“For 13 minutes, my TV didn’t have white people in the screen. I am getting oppressed!!!” That idiot

I wish Alan Turing would get to enjoy modern life

Don’t say no to something you haven’t tried!

I think you mostly confirmed my understanding. Thanks for your input.

Take care and stay safe.

If someone is married for the others body, they are an idiot.

Of course, it is good if we all can appreciate our partner’s beauty. I hope they are.

Seriously, based on what i heard grindr makes it really really really easy to hook up. Like based on what I was told, you can find someone for now.

Now I might be wrong… but I don’t think someone looking for a relationship (and 500 bucks per month to spend it like that) will struggle to find someone to date. And if my information is correct, hooking up would be even easier.

So why would someone spend 500bucks per month on that.

Gay people, I need your input. Is my information correct?

I might be wrong but so many times I hear people talk about how big breast are desirable, how a big ass is desirable, how curves are great.

And then seemingly the same idiot look at women like that and talk shit… I am wondering if it is cope because they are jealous because everything else is insane.

He tried to make money by producing cp with grok.

That statement is true, not hyperbolic. He knew people would use his ai to produce cp and he put a price tag on it.

Are you aware of any mail server or client that is not using encrypted channels by default?

Most of the internet, nowadays, is encrypted on transmission.

Some things are end-to-end encrypted, some things are only encrypted for transmission, and rarely (nowadays) things are not encrypted at all.

Emails are encrypted for transmission.

That means, your email is readable on your computer, on your email server, on their email server and on their computer. Your email is not readable by your router, their router, your ISP, their ISP, or anyone operating a machine over which the transmission happens.

There are end-to-end encryption for email but you would know if you would use it.