Oh, sorry, I said that totally wrong: I meant that I really appreciate your first comment and that it’s not worth your time to reply to their bad-faith follow-up comment.

The answer is that it’s messy and that I’m not qualified to say where the line is (nor, I think, is anyone yet). The generated parts are not copyrightable, but you can still have a valid copyright by bringing together things that aren’t individually copyrightable. For example, if I make a manga where Snow White fights Steamboat Willie, I’ve taken two public domain elements and used them to create a copyrightable work.

So it’s not like the usage of AI inherently makes a project uncopyrightable unless the entire thing or most of it was just spat out of a machine. Where’s the line on this? Nobody (definitely not me, but probably nobody) really knows.

As for courts ever finding out, how this affects trade secret policy… Dunno? I’m sure a Microsoft employee couldn’t release it publicly, because as you said, it’d probably violate an NDA. If there were some civil case, the source may come out during discovery and could maybe be analysed programmatically or by an expert. You would probably subpoena the employee(s) who wrote the software and ask them to testify. This is just spitballing, though, over something that’s probably inconsequential, because the end product is prooooobably still copyrightable.

This kind of reminds me of the blurry line we have in FOSS, where everyone retains the copyright to their individual work. But if push comes to shove, how much does there need to be for it to be copyrightable? Where does it stop being a boilerplate for loop and start being creative expression?

Just as a sanity check: the person you’re responding to is a serial troll and what I can only describe as intellectually dishonest at best or a pathological liar at worst. They make up whatever they want and will never concede that the fucking nonsense they just dreamed up five seconds ago based on nothing is wrong in the face of conclusive proof otherwise.

You shouldn’t waste your time responding to this cretin.

Technology is an extremely vague word in this context.

Dude, just shut the fuck up and own up to what you were doing. You’re acting like a snivelly little child. I’ve seen you around a couple times before, and it’s like all you exist to do on Lemmy is make up and spread misinformation.

You’re just making shit up. The US Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit has affirmed that AI-generated work is in the public domain. Put up or shut up.

Edit: Additionally, the US Copyright Office writes:

As the agency overseeing the copyright registration system, the [Copyright] Office has extensive experience in evaluating works submitted for registration that contain human authorship combined with uncopyrightable material, including material generated by or with the assistance of technology.

Seriously, I have way more sympathy for people who get tickets in places like NYC. More crowded, more chaotic, more rules. It happens.

By ticket 38, though, I’m at least 20 tickets past the point where I’ve decided I’m not competent enough and started just taking a mix of cycling and public transit.

I’ve never seen Magic Earth, but as an OSM contributor, I don’t understand why I’d use a subscription service when all the underlying data is free (as in beer and freedom) and contributed by volunteers (and likely not the app devs). One-time app purchases like OsmAnd I understand because you’re doing stuff with the data like routing, overlays, etc., and that requires development work. But a subscription seems absurd.

This sounds like a fake website that Kitboga would make up for scambaiting.

It all makes sense now. The reason Republican conventions see spikes in Grindr usage isn’t because they’re closeted gay; it’s because they think they can ask around for tips and tricks.

That’s actually another really good point: North American stroads have to be so fucking tedious for people who actually want to get something out of their cars. It’s the same shit everywhere so there’s nothing to see, you go just fast enough for your $100,000 car to be totaled if someone sneezes at you but not enough for it to be fun, you’re constantly in danger thanks to the poor design, and it’s you and a goddamn thousand people trying to get to Paunch Burger.

Imagine you had a high-end gaming PC and the only way to use it was to play cheap asset flips. I’m not saying we make roads into racetracks when the normies are gone; rather, I’m saying holy shit, the roads in well-designed urban places are so much more interesting and beautiful to drive in.

Yeah, car guys in my experience consistently think (maybe correctly) that everyone else on the road but them is a total moron. You don’t like those pesky cyclists sharing the road with you? Neither do most of us cyclists; let’s get them on separated paths. Don’t like morons who can’t drive? Make it so they don’t have to. Don’t like traffic? Take the other space-inefficient cars off the road.

I think car people recognize that just positively reinforcing micromobility and public transit can improve their experience.

I’d rather ride with an organization that doesn’t have Twitter Gold, but we take what we can get, I guess…

Maybe they’re implying Bubba wasn’t the only one…

Since you put it in scare quotes, here’s what RNC Research is. (MS NOW is an openly biased opinion source, but it shouldn’t take a lot of convincing that this is an obvious MAGA propaganda account.)

Anyway, the MAGA propaganda account that is RNC Research is answering to the full Omar quote, which is transparently directed at Trump. I’m not going to abide the doublethink of “Mainstream media needs to stop letting Trump and the far-right skirt responsibility for their statements by dressing them up in plausible deniability; they need to state what he’s obviously, actually saying” (they do, and I see that sentiment here all the time) and “Wow, this account is calling Trump a pedophile by cutting through the plausible deniability speak and acknowledging who literally everyone knows Omar meant when she said this.”

Even if I were somehow delusional enough at this point to think Trump is not a child rapist, it’s still trivially obvious who Omar means, and pretending otherwise is grossly disingenuous. You don’t inherently have to believe an insult to recognize who’s being insulted.

The headline is written that way because Omar’s full statement was:

The leader of the Pedophile Protection Party is trying to deflect attention from his name being all over the Epstein files.

At least in Somalia they execute pedophiles not elect them.

Kumar is lying by omission to make the joke work.

You’re missing a second “they fuck you over” edge from the big tech vertex back to yours.

It’s not that it requires two (did you mean twin?) actors; that’s what I meant about “not fully writing the play around them”. The example here has someone wake up in a different place than they just were a split second ago, and the effect is really convincing because they’re twins. You could make this work without twins, but it’s a neat bit of trickery that’s easy and seamless because you have twins to work with.

I have seen The Prestige a long time ago! I totally forgot.

That’s my secret: it’s empty.

I fully support this measure. If the country’s population hits 10 million, the people who supported it can be guillotined for a better Switzerland. Then we can all move on with our lives and never revisit this horrible idea.