This Bombers fan isn’t mad about seeing Calgary (barely) lose one…

Not equipped to handle sexual assault cases. This is a very well-documented issue.

I’m not certain about the retro-style logo on the wall (I suspect the blockier lettering on the tote bag represents the actual series logo), but might this be the first look at (a version of) the series uniform?

This has unfortunately been the case in sexual assault cases since…forever, really.

There are almost never any witnesses, human memory is fallible, alcohol is sometimes a factor…the justice system is not well-equipped to handle it.

Good - the original case seemed pretty straightforward.

I think the general policy is that genetic augmentation to grant superpowers is bad, while genetic treatment of disease or other medical conditions is generally okay.

They tiptoed right up to the line without outright stating it.

I don’t really have a problem with the resolution…it just seemed to have been unplanned and bolted on, and was contradictory to the beginning of the season.

Payroll is a large portion of any budget, and I haven’t seen any credible claims that it’s possible to cut round it, or that they’re even trying.

I don’t think it’s possible to make budget cuts that huge without cutting staff.

You’re free to give them the benefit of the doubt. The union is not obligated to, and I’m inclined to think their concerns are very valid.

the SNW stardate madness would seem to continue

Nature is healing.

I’d hardly call it “cherry picking” - “We are also committed to capping, not cutting, public service employment” is a complete statement unto itself, and constitutes an election promise. There’s no ambiguity, and there are no caveats provided.

If you want to make the argument that they intend to reduce departmental budgets by 15% without cutting staff…I’m willing to listen to it, but I don’t think it’s likely to happen. And the departments don’t appear to have been instructed to do so.

hopefully not the same way as Paris and Janeway went.

Nah, there’s a flower involved. That can only mean one thing.

I don’t remember seeing them before.

I also don’t remember any previous shots that establish that the conference room is off the bridge…

This one won’t be going down in history as my favourite episode.

Much of the episode is devoted to zombies, and zombies are boring. Moving on.

This might just be reflective of where my headspace has been at lately, but it bugged me that the crew showed absolute contempt for a treaty. There was absolutely no discussion of whether it was moral or just to violate it - they just wanted something, so they went ahead and took it. This isn’t exactly new ground for Star Trek, but it wasn’t something that I enjoyed watching in 2025.

I can’t decide if this was a bad Pike episode, or a good Pike episode that happened to reveal things about the character that I don’t appreciate. It’s telling that Batel didn’t tell him about her treatment because she knew that he would react in exactly the way that he did.

I wasn’t sure how I felt about clearing up the ambiguity of what happened with M’Benga last season, but I think it was handled pretty well - the strongest part of the episode by far. It seems like he might have a…different career path ahead of him when he leaves the Enterprise.

The Ortegas/Una story wasn’t bad, either. I do find it interesting that Pike will not be filing a report on this mission because it was off-the-books, but Ortegas gets reprimanded and sent for remedial training. I’m not sure how that works when there’s no mission to log.

I thought the directing and/or editing was pretty lifeless (heh) in this one, too - not a lot of tension throughout.

Here’s the platform.

We are also committed to capping, not cutting, public service employment. Federal workers deliver essential services to Canadians and are critical to helping Canada meet this moment of crisis. As part of our review of spending we will ensure that the size of the federal public service meets the needs of Canadians.

I don’t remember reading anything about them being “directed” to do so by the government, and even if that’s the case, that was last year, well before the election.

I’m honestly relieved - if there’s one area in which I think his government has been lacking, it’s been the environmental portfolio.

This restraint is a positive step, even though it’s been framed as a reconciliation concern.

On Tuesday, the premiers of Alberta, Saskatchewan and Ontario also signed memorandums of understanding to build new pipelines, railroads and energy infrastructure to move oil, gas and critical minerals between the provinces. Manitoba did not sign the agreement.

Kinew said Manitoba’s major infrastructure projects must first have a consensus from Indigenous stakeholders before putting shovels in the ground.

I’m glad to see this, and also very curious to see the consequences.