because the ‘actors’ could not be verified they were of appropriate age, or if they had consented to being in mass distributed pronography. it was a needed change, which is why i think putting restriction on the access to porn is a bad idea, because only the closest thing to reputable sites will honor the demand, leaving only the skuzziest of options available

no more place holders. either they provide a candidate that runs progressive ideals or they can run the election without my vote

a whole bag of brussel sprouts. maybe with a hot dog and apple

if i want to get fancy, maybe hamburger soup, or green bean casserole

i’m not voting for him if he was the last candidate on earth

i don’t know, does this change anything?

they either were facetious to make… no point. or were earnest. either way

yea… most of the time the cost of rent is lower then there houses market rate, and it still didn’t change anything about artificially raising that said rate. you didn’t change anything about the problem at all!

the issue i see with being concerned that low supported groups would get more money then they would otherwise…is the point. the main reason other parties don’t have a presence is because they do not have the money to honestly present themselves. and we are talking reach here, if they are given equal reach, and what they say is agreed to by more people, then it turns out that they didn’t have minimal support, they were being quashed by special interests

you are applying immunity of criticism of a persons actions, based on what a person is.

Land lords owning more properties then they need taking them off the market causes systemic harm. at no point in that equation did their status as an immigrant or not, have any bearing on the action nor the outcome.

actually Kyle Mercer was the one who created the meeting

it’s never about supporting israel, or protecting the jewish people. they are more then happy to orchestrate war between foreigners. they support tyrany, the outcome of their death cult, as a means to abuse power and wealth. israel is just another pawn by any other name

i thought something was up. a snow man made of the fluffiest powder would absolutely totall my car. ain’t no way i would just hit snow men

i don’t believe it and am no longer giving them the chance to allow me to see it.

market dominance is not a monopoly. market dominance is a label given to the most successful product. and the product is successful because they offer a service that none else seems to be able to or wish to fulfill.

devs can choose to sell their game on steam, or windows live, or gog, epic game store, playstation, nintendo online, android app store, ios app store, on their own site, eb games, or the back of their car, what ever.

are all of these equally effective? nope. when you put your game on steam you get, the vast user base cultivated by valve, server space to host your game, massive server upload speeds, a built in store front, the discussion boards, steam game cloud, the stream overlays and stream input, steam workshop, community hubs, steam achievements, global money processing, themed sales, two special discovery windows. blah blah blah.

again, it’s up to the dev to decide if they want to pay 30% for these things.

to put it in perspective, when epic game store has a sale, steam makes a profit.

and steam needs data centers and servers and power and all the stuff to keep those running. ultimately though it didn’t matter. if steam thinks that their ecosystem is worth charging that much, then it’s up to the dev to decide if what steam provides is worth it to them

well i am waiting

you could try answering, but conceding works just as well

and why would gamers not buy their game elsewhere?

sounds like YOU don’t know what a monopoly is

if it’s not justifiable, then the game devs can go elsewere.