Schön wär’s. Aber es ist leider sehr einfach ohne Konsequenzen auf marginalisierte Gruppen einzutreten.
Schön wär’s. Aber es ist leider sehr einfach ohne Konsequenzen auf marginalisierte Gruppen einzutreten.
Schön nach unten treten, damit man nicht merkt wie miserabel das eigene Leben ist.
And it worked. Try finding any professional art/design jobs that don’t use Adobe.
Weil die Grünen und die SPD ein gutes Stück sozialer sind als die FDP oder die CxU. Mir ist im Zweifelsfall eine starke und imperfekte Grüne Partei, die die schlimmsten Tendenzen ihrer Koalitionspartner stoppen und zumindest Teile ihres eigenen Programms duchsetzen kann, lieber als eine perfekte 1%-Partei die absolut keinen Einfluss auf irgendwas hat.
Die Regierung ist allgemein unbeliebt weil sie einfach seit Jahren nichts zu Stande bringt außer Streit. Liegt nicht wirklich an den Grünen und nicht Mal and der SPD, aber ist in der öffentlichen Wahrnehmung halt ein Fall von “mit gefangen, mit gehangen”.
Es gibt viel Raum zwischen “Mitte und Mitte-Rechts” und “radikal Links”. Jetzt noch eine bedeutungslose Splitterpartei zu gründen, statt in den Grünen für soziale Politik einzutreten ist nicht hilfreich, vor allem weil die Grünen in vielen Ländern sowieso schon mit der Fünf-Prozent-Hürde zu kämpfen haben.
Tiktok und YouTube haben beide Algorithmen die Recommendations für individuelle User machen. Ich bekomme auf YouTube (wenn ich eingeloggt bin) auch keine Nazischeiße serviert. Gut, ich gucke keine Shorts also weiß ich nicht wie es in dem Bereich aussieht, aber Long Form ist definitiv individualisiert.
Die werden unironisch den bösen Ausländern die Schuld geben und ihr eigenes Verhalten kein bisschen hinterfragen.
Regarding your initial set of links, I think it’s clear that I don’t consider these particularly credible. With that said, the accusation obviously has some degree of surface-level plausibility. But there’s more to genocide than “people are being killed”.
What about the Israeli government themselves claiming a (very dubious) 50/50 civilian-militant casualty ratio?
I don’t have any issues with that. I know, that sounds callous but considering that urban warfare and sieges always have exceptionally horrific civilian death tolls even without one side (Hamas) very deliberately placing as many civilians between them and the enemy as they can, I’d argue that those numbers are actually exceptionally good.
We’ve flattened cities in WW2 with better casualty ratios than that.
Not for lack of trying. Civilian casualties were basically a non-concern for the Americans (this is also true of Israel), and the Brits very deliberately sought out attacked purely civilian targets in a terror bombing campaign (this is not). Me saying Israels conduct reminds me of the Allies in WW2 was not a commendation of either. I consider both to be necessary evils to eliminate the Nazis and Hamas respectively.
What about prominent members of the Israeli government openly saying the intention is to commit genocide?
Ben-Gvir and his party certainly would like to turn it into a genocide, but coalition governments don’t work that way. A public statement from one minor coalition member doesn’t make something government policy. Otzma Yehudit has two ministers and six seats in the Knesset, they’re very much not able to dictate government policy. The fact that they haven’t been kicked out of the coalition over their remarks is concerning, but so far that’s all it is.
Ideally I would want to see governmental acknowledgment, but I wouldn’t call it a hard requirement. But ultimately it depends on the evidence presented, and on the people and institutions who agree/disagree with it. I can’t really give you a more firm answer than that.
Majority. As long as they can present convincing evidence (i.e. evidence that doesn’t rely on trusting the word of Hamas and/or their friends in Doha and Tehran).
Edit: I’ll also say that I trust some Western governments more than others. I’ll take the word of the current German government over that of the current Italian one, for example.
I can’t speak for them, but a general consensus among Western governments.
It’s the objective truth. Yes, the IDF could probably do more to protect civilians but at the absolute worst what they’re doing is comparable to the conduct of the Western Allies against Germany in WW2.
Usually Steam. I like the idea of GoG, but a lot of the time if you want mods you’re basically forced to buy it on Steam because of the Workshop. Also, I kinda like having everything in one place.
Not in this context. Curious can have the same meaning as “kurios”, as it does here.
The UFP has a currency - Federation Credits. The average citizen may not need (or even have) money, but it exists and is presumably accessible in some way if you have genuine need. For example the station personnel on DS9 never had issues paying at Quark’s, so one can assume that they did get a salary because they were posted to a capitalist environment. I’d assume that child support would work on a similar “as needed” basis.
I don’t think you can lump Endeavour and Garuda together. Yes, they’re both based on Arch but Endeavours basically is Arch with a GUI installer and sane defaults while Garuda changes a ton of things and adds a ton of customisations that make it very different from a plain Arch (or Endeavour) system.
In places that already have the necessary infrastructure in place or that can actually afford to lose billions, and that are actually in a location where outdoor sports aren’t literally suicide (looking at you, Qatar World Cup). That’s the only way for the Olympics to not be a massive burden on the host city.
You mean that time when North Korea invaded South Korea? They weren’t “caught lacking” they started the war.
Another issue was that Vista had very steep system requirements, which Microsoft deliberately understated. As a result it ran like shit on a ton of machines despite them technically meeting the requirements.