Yeah, I don’t entirely object to the reverse (as long as California is adopted into the family), but making Canada part of the US? No thank you. Fucking crab bucket mentality; can’t let other people have nice things.

That’s been on my list of movies I need to show my partner for ages; I just haven’t been in the mood to ugly cry that is required before watching it.

The happiest of accidents!

OP replaces with Butter and ella. Seems doable.

Another one to block; thanks for the heads up!

Ugh, OP created this account an hour ago and I’ve already run across several of their posts. I’m tired of the spam accounts.

Gotta wait for it to be daytime in their part of the world, after all.

I’m not even sure I read everything on here because it was an overwhelming amount of information. Excellent representation, for me, at least.

Pretending to choke on Trump’s tiny penis whenever the press sec isn’t doing it. Also pretending to be the Attorney General, but I don’t think she’s doing as good a job at that.

Oh man, stop, I can only get so erect.

I am extremely disappointed that I can’t unread this.

I cackled at the card joke. Thank you for that 😂

I identify more with the sun, here: unimpressed with the world and on fire.

See, the internet censors it for you; you don’t need to do it yourself! All I see is sh!t, p!$$, c**t, c0ckscker, m0th3rfuck3r, and tits.

Also, animals are extremely vulnerable when going potty, so I’d expect they assume we are, too; they’re protecting us at our most vulnerable. ☺️

I would argue that, without the punctuation, it’s not technically correct. The references to James and John saying “had had,” at least, should be in quotes. Additionally, unless broken up with a semicolon or a period before the final four “hads,” it’s a run-on sentence.

If you change the “hads” that mean provided/said in the context of the sentence (excluding the quoted ones), you could write it as:

James, while John had [said] “had”, had [said] “had had”; “had had” had [provided] a better effect on the teacher.

And though it doesn’t flow right to me to have James and his action verb split by a phrase about John, I’m not sure that’s incorrect. Phrasing it to fix the flow, for me, would be:

While John had [said] “had”, James had [said] “had had”; “had had” had [provided] a better effect on the teacher.

The Wolfcastle reference on top of everything was, dare I say it, excellent.

I tripped on that one and ended up saying “European pianer player union,” which made me laugh until I coughed.

I am not sober. I just had far too much fun saying “europinyinyinyin” out loud over and over again, so thank you for that. :)

I think I have some extended family who probably say it similarly to that, too. Probably the ones from the deep south.

Alternately, do sell it, but make sure it’s guaranteed to fail and become an expensive paperweight upon first use. I’d prefer your option, but I’ll take mine if I can’t get yours.