AFAIK it’s been a challenge some people did on… twitter I think?
Basically it’s “Tell me you’re XYZ without telling me you’re XYZ” and people responded with funny answers.
At some point that got turned around and people satrted to use that sencence structure to indicate that the thing they are commenting on would have been a great answer for that challenge.

It took quite some liberty with the “pixels” in the eyes. 😅

Tell me you work in the US without telling me you work in the US.

I can recommend the “Behind the Bastards” (podcast) episode on Steve Jobs.
What a weird… weird man.

lol, is that this “small government” and the oh so free market that we keep hearing so much about?

Love the image of wheeds just popping up all over your garden where you don’t want them.
It’s a great metaphor for the “HEY, TRY THIS NEW THING!” shit microsoft pulls.

Additionally much software (and hardware even more) primarely targets windows as a platform. The way printers mostly “just work”™ on Linux still amazes me, because printer vendors have all the incentives to make their stuff work for the most used platform, which sadly isn’t Linux right now.

Don’t worry, we need more of those too. <3

Then you’d have 0 dollars because they aren’t dorks. They’re nerds and we need more of them. ¯_ (ツ)_/¯

Not yet…

Full disclosure: I ran manjaro as a daily driver for a while a few years back bad have been forced back on windows as well by company policy. So I’m not going to be the ultimate authority to answer your questions.
All I wanted to comment is that with iTunes and Office you have picked two pieces of software by two companies that have a very strong interest in not letting you migrate away from them. I tried to migrate my gf’s password manager from the iCloud one to bitwarden and it’s amazing the hoops they make you jump through to get at your data. So what you might be experiencing right now is a thing called “vendor lock”, and I wish you the best of luck for finding a way out. ;)

Love the Cave Johnson quote in the readme that just preempts any of those pesky “why” questions.

Have a look around…

Yeah, I remember the first time I saw the :// thing I felt myself having a little design-gasm.
This doesn’t touch the same spot for me…

Looks great. Happy to have (hopefully) helped. =)

Very nice, I definitely couldn’t do it better! Maybe if I could give some constructive feedback: The color you used for the shadows in the face is very desaturated and on the fist glance it looks a bit like there’s dirt on her face. 😅 So maybe just use a darker skin color for those areas?

But again, looks very nice and I couldn’t do it any better. Especially the eyes look great!

Thanks for this island of cute happiness among all the doom and gloom. This is nice.

I also try to say “look it up online” as much as possible in stead of Googling it.

You’ll have to ask an economist about that. The next one you meet, just ask them that question witout context. They’ll know what you’re talking about.

Had to look them up. But no, absolutely not. Any N-gon that is closer to a 1-gon than to an ∞-gon would definitely do more harm than good.