• Understand and use the latest AI tools effectively in their chosen field(s), including identifying the key capabilities, strengths and limits of AI technologies, as well as ways that AI can transform existing methods, processes and tools
• Recognize and communicate clearly about AI use, decisions and limitations, including developing and defending decisions informed by AI-driven insights, as well as recognizing the presence, influence and consequences of AI in decision-making
• Adapt to and work with future AI developments effectively and continually

I’m not sure about every graduate needing this, but at the same time these seem like reasonable goals. Wouldn’t you want the next generation to understand the weaknesses of ai? The pitfalls of trusting it? Recognizing how to use it smartly?

No doubt these kids are already using it. Why not train them in its pros and cons?

The kneejerk reaction that this is bad seems shortsighted to me. Every person, ai supporter or hater, should understand how AI works and how it doesn’t work.

“false claims” Lies. They were lies.

Zuck is at least a close runner up.

Something about this is absolutely hilarious to me. Sad though when thinking about it critically.

Lol, is this pov of the projector hung from the ceiling?

18 Republicans also opposed the budget. If every Democrat had joined the 18 Republicans in saying no, this budget would not have been approved

This is usually by design to protect risky seats and give the impression that they were opposed for political points. In essence those 18 Republicans are only enabled to vote no because they know Dems are supporting this passing. If more Dems voted no, less Republicans would have.

Totally worth it to read the second and third. The first book almost feels unrelated but it’s got some crucial context that gets built on to the extreme later Easily my top 5 sci-fi

We are operating with different definitions, I guess. Vladimir Putin absolutely is a Russian “elite” under my world view.

Who are those with “a lot of money to throw at it” that are not the elites?

I swear he keeps moving

5 years of wfh starting because of covid. I’ve not once had my camera on for an external meeting (multiple daily). Only got shit for it twice.

I do pop my cam on for team meetings tho but I’m willing to do that to keep the peace

Think about where AI was 10 years ago. Cutting edge AI was able to accept an video, and put bounding boxes around a predefined set of objects it’s able to recognize (see You Only Look Once paper, 2015). That was about it.

10 years before that, cutting edge AI was maybe digit recognition. I’m not sure.

Your own understanding of history is incorrect https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_artificial_intelligence?wprov=sfla1

I have no comment on this vid or the scishow, but you’re comment is ignorant on the reality of progression of ai-related fields. Having computers “learn” has been a thing for much longer than 20 years.

I must be quite the successful troll to get you to engage multiple times. Good luck with your relationship, I hope you put as much and more effort into it as you have this stupid comment chain.

It’s ok to let a relationship go that you arent feeling the chemistry in. But it seems like you’re too focused on what you’d lose than realize that you aren’t the right fit for each other in the first place.

Bro just talk to your girlfriend and try and love her more for fucks sake.

Why do you need our permission to do so? I’m in here saying that you sound like you want to love her but don’t yet, either work on it or move on.

It’s hilarious how you won’t engage with my feedback but instead attack my character.

Maybe you haven’t actually grown from your previous toxic relationship.

Ah interesting. Well according to what I’m reading you are misunderstanding what attitude is for. It describes my engagement patterns, not how my posts are received. A lower attitude means I down vote more than I up vote.

You’re welcome to your opinions but you’re incorrect with how that feature is described Here’s a link with more info for you. https://piefed.social/comment/7077647

Your post is asking if you should ignore your lack of a deeper connection in favor of those logistics only. I’m saying that the way you describe the relationship appears to only be centered on those logistics. You seem to want more and aren’t getting that more. You should decide if you can settle for a less than ideal love for the other benefits they can offer. It seems like you already aren’t sure you can settle.

Lol what? Idk what that stat even means. Bro you should talk with your girlfriend more if getting feedback from lemmy strangers is too much for you.

Either you want her for her status and that’s enough for you, or it isn’t.

You can learn to love someone more deeply, but you obviously want more than what she offers right now. I don’t understand why highlighting that to you is so hard for you to hear. I’m literally validating what you are asking in your OP.

I’m agreeing with you that maybe she isn’t the right fit for you, lol. You obviously want more and she isn’t that for you.

You say I keep talking about logistics? When did I do that? You’re literally just making things up now.

Bro you used the word twice in your op. I’m just using the words you started with.

Yes I read it and you focus on her appearance and her success. You don’t mention any details in your op about why she matters to you beyond how your friends and family perceive her.

You describe wanting a partner to settle down with and yet you fail to mention any reasons beyond her appearance for why her logistics are meaningful.

You ask if you if you are a fool to consider that you should love someone more deeply than their “logistics”.

So yes, I did read what you wrote about her. You seem conflicted between an attractive partner and finding someone you love.

You don’t seem to love her, you love her features.