Well, it shouldn’t be carbon neutral… It should used to get carbon out of the atmosphere and into a less damaging substance.
Carbon capture does not replace getting rid of our dependency on burning fossil fuels.
We wouldn’t get back the same amount that we are burning anyway. So this approach is worse, because dumb people think it would save us, without us changing the way we produce energy.
It is worse, because it is a distraction from actually doing something.
Carbon dioxide needs to be captured were there is a lot of carbon dioxide in the air. So especially around cities with lots of car traffic, or around fossil fuel power plants…
So… It would be better to stop car traffic and fossil fuel power plants first, before doing carbon capture. And the purpose of that should be, making the air cleaner. And putting that carbon back into a less environmental damaging state.
It really depends on the purpose. Sometimes you can hide stuff in unexpected places when there isn’t much interest for other people to find it, or if they don’t even know about it’s existence.
Also sometimes it is good enough to just delay the discovery of something for a while, because its value after a certain time diminished completely.
So, I would argue that sometimes security by obscurity can be useful. But I agree that it generally shouldn’t replace proper encryption.
Wie schnell “Schrittgeschwindigkeit” ist, ist leider nicht klar festgesetzt… Gerichte akzeptieren bis zu 15km/h. Und am Ende, wenn Nicht-Autofahrer auf ihre Rechte bestehen wollen, sind die eh mitschuldig.
https://www.adac.de/verkehr/recht/verkehrsvorschriften-deutschland/schrittgeschwindigkeit/
In allen Fällen wird Fußgängern ein umsichtiges vorausschauendes Verhalten abverlangt. Wer sich – ohne zu gucken – auf die Wartepflicht des Autos verlässt, den trifft regelmäßig eine Mitschuld von 25%. Das Mitverschulden kann je nach Umständen des Einzelfalls auch höher ausfallen. So kann den Fußgänger sogar eine 100%-ige Schuld treffen, wenn er sich sein Vorrecht erzwingt.
Also, nicht darauf verlassen das sich Autofahrer an die Regeln halten, und bloß nicht auf die Rechte gegenüber Autofahrern bestehen.
IDK, OSM is much more detailed and up to date.
Btrfs is a filesystem just like ext4, you can mount the root subvolume and upload all files somewhere.
Timeshift is not a backup solution though. Snapshots are built-in with btrfs. So you can install a snapshotter tool like Snapper. But it would be best if you already have partitioned you btrfs filesystem into multiple subvolumes. Like the suggested layout.
More like disassociation. They just don’t connect killing animals to eating meat. So they don’t feel a cognitive dissonance.
Like… People living comfortable in captialistic countries/societies, don’t think they personally kill all victims of capitalism. They just don’t connect these things. They disassociate their life and living standards from the ‘others’.
Testing SPECIAL with games seems boring. They should do a multi layered social deduction game instead, where everyone has different goals, lies to another and nobody really understands what is going on until the end.
So some contestants are actors, and think they know where the show is going, but they are tricked as well.
Das Trifft halt nur die Webseiten d.h. die Rampe am Gebäude, mir geht es mehr um den Weg zur Webseite. Also der Infrastruktur. Und hier, sollte wie gesagt jeder ohne Extraaufwand und Kosten angebunden sein. Grundversorgung, wie der Fußweg von der Wohnung zum Rathaus.
Denke bei Barrierefreiheit nicht nur an körperlich eingeschränkte Personen, sondern auch beispielsweise an Obdachlose.
Schon, aber wie gesagt, es muss halt alles auch zu greifbar für Eingeschränkte Leute sein. Offline gibt es ja auch Gesetze für sowas, und wenn das technisch Schwierig ist sollte der Staat das unterstützen.
Offline baut der Staat mit Steuergeldern Fußwege, und macht die i.d.R. beschreibbar für alle um das Rathaus zu erreichen. Tut er nicht im Internet.
Geht hier um die Grundversorgung. Internet ist ja inzwischen Lebensnotwendig, also Grundversorgung soll von der Gesellschaft getragen werden.
Internet ist klar kein Neuland, aber ich finde es trotzdem wichtig sich als Gesellschaft nicht abhängig von privat betriebener Infrastruktur zu machen.
Wenn Internet für Bürger erwartet wird, soll die Infrastruktur selbst in öffentlicher oder non-profit Hand sein.
Außerdem muss es auch immer Zugänglich für Personen mit Körperlichen, finanziellen oder Bildungs Einschränkungen sein, also sollte Software um das Internet zu Nutzen entsprechend entwickelt und offen der Gesellschaft zur Verfügung gestellt werden, d.h. Deutsche bzw. EU Förderungen bzw. Projekte für open source Browser, Betriebssysteme, PC Hardware, sowie Smartphones, etc. Kostenlose Internetkiosks und Flächendeckendes WiFi/Mobiles Netzwerk auch.
Man sollte nicht von Bürgern für alltägliche Geschäfte mit dem Staat, erwarten Dienstleistungen von privaten profit-orientierten Unternehmen in Anspruch zu nehmen und damit persönliche Daten an diese zu übergeben.
Das Gerichtsgebäude, Rathaus oder öffentliche Fußwege gehört ja auch keinem privatem Unternehmen, welche hier selber Überwachungskameras aufstellen darf um bei allen Vorgängen etwas mitzubekommen, und sei es nur Metadaten.
Oder 50% der Befölkerung abschieben.
(Lasse mal offen welche.)
No, it isn’t part of the EU.
It is part of the Kingdom of Denmark, which isn’t in the EU. Only Denmark, a country within the Kingdom is in the EU.
However, the citizen of Greenland are citizen of Denmark, thus EU citizen.
But you are right that Greenland has a closer relationship with the EU, then Ukraine. And the EU and allies want to protect its citizens at least. And via its member state Denmark, the constituents of Kingdom of Denmark as well.
Edit: To be honest, I have no clue what happens to citizen of Greenland, if US would take over… Would they be EU and US citizen? Would they have to leave? Well… Let’s hope that doesn’t get answered anytime.
So like syncthing but you have to pay for it and requires a server. Seems useless…
If you want to sync while not all devices are online, just spend 50$ or something and get a RPI and put syncthing on it.
Yes he is pathetic and he is a bully.
And too many people think bullies that just take what they want are ‘strong’.
Recently deepwiki links started popping up in my search results, when I wanted to research some software. They offered so much genenerated ‘documentation’ that it caused so much confusion and irritation to me, I installed an extension just to block this site from my search results.
Why do I ever need to read the ‘architecture’ or whatever from an ancient no longer maintained project. The deepwiki page didn’t mention that it isn’t maintained, but the readme.md in the repo states it clearly at the very top with big letters…
Any suggestion for a browser plugin that blocks AIslop pages from search results? I think we really need some kind of ad block for this, but differently. A well maintained list of pages containing AI slop and then filtering out those pages from search results instead. So that the internet becomes/remains usable and mostly unpoisend by this stuff.
AIslop should never outrank human created content.
I am not someone that cries about the end times much, but… If this issues isn’t addressed effectively and the internet becomes filled with aislop that outrank and thus hide human content… it becomes useless… We might really have to look for a new one…
The internet is for connecting humans through their machines. If it starts to exist without requiring humans, then it can be its own thing and humans have to find something else then.
/rant
deleted by creator
Tons of people in STEM fields dreamt about it for years.
Not a native English speaker but “dreamt” is past tense, so they stopped dreaming, implying they stopped because now we have “AI”.
Prediction and pattern recognition is not general AI. This is just what LLMs and image generators do. They find plausible continuations starting from a noise to better fit the disired outcome. They don’t have real contextual knowledge about a domain. To them everything is just numbers that can be manipulated until they fit better. They don’t just instantly know the correct or incorrect answer because of a deeper understanding on the matter.
Most people use whatever is the default, even if that default doesn’t perfectly is to their needs/wants.
That applies even to people that changed their search engine form Google to Duckduckgo.
Every decisions takes some energy to think about, and the human brain wants to avoid spending energy as much as possible.
That is why LLMs should be opt-in/by-request instead of opt-out. If people want to occasionally use them, they can decide themselves if spending that additional electricity is worth it.
Search engines and LLMs are different things, one is for finding content written by humans, the other is for getting a plausible answer to a inquiry.