The difference being that Motorola is a well established device manufacturer and not just a community project with minimal funding. Google using play integrity to exclude a competitor could be very easily seen as an abuse of market power and they already have problems with antitrust laws.
No alternative codecs wont do, the application we are building has a hard dependency on these specific dlls due to another dependency requiring them. It was also just one example of many excuse my hyperbole. Here is another one, try to get winget to work with a local package cache. You have to go to some third party developer for that. Want another one? How about debugging windows binaries in an offline environment. Reasonable requirement? Microsoft says no.
Why is this arbitrarily “a whole different story” and who said anything about UWP, it’s the media codecs we depend on. Windows 10 N offered an offline installer for that “optional feature” and now Microslop makes my life more difficult for no reason at all.
Ok, where can I download the Media Feature Pack for Windows 11 N as an offline installer?
At my job we are working with a few air gapped Windows machines which is already really annoying because Microslop doesn’t offer offline installers for anything related to Windows 11 anymore. I expect this to get even more difficult over time.
Also:
I never said that you can remove a license retroactively. A CLA is an assignment of copyright from the contributor to the company. The only reason for a company to add a CLA to a project is to put a rug under the project which they will pull as soon as they gained a critical mass of users. It fundamentally undermines the social contract of open source development. These companies want to enjoy all the benefits of open source, like the market appeal and the free labour, but none of the drawbacks. A CLA is just one thing, a promise that the project will go non-free in the future.
Let me introduce you to the magical concept of the CLA. It means they can do whatever they want with the project but you can not. You should never contribute to CLA projects.
Copyleft is non-commercial haven’t you heard? I mean its really unfair, the code is completely free but you are not allowed to create the torment nexus without everybody seeing your work.
Yes its kind of possible with F# and Fable. I did it a few years ago. I say kind of because its still transpiling to javascript.
It was horse shit when jakearchibald wrote it; its still horse shit now.
Very very simple.
Really? I find it quite feature packed for a notes taking app.
Here are a few more:
Its an outliner, a colleague of mine basically lives in that thing.
It’s almost perfect for me but the browser based editing made it unusable because there is no way to unmap Ctrl + W in a browser and I can’t live without my Vim bindings.
This is the solution for normal people who don’t spend n+1 hours tweaking their editor configuration.
For people who do spend n+1 hours tweaking their emacs configuration.
I’ve started to feel like Ed Zitron is actively hurting people I care about…
Have you been abused by Ed Zitron being mean to your favourite AI? You might be entitled to compensation!
Document the features and requirements, then rewrite it with proper architecture and without LLMs.
This looks like it was inspired by Vermis.
Well bcachefs is kill. Enjoy AI support and all userspace code generated by a slot machine. Kent also does that weird anthropomorphising of his LLM by giving it a blog.
A well cut suite is really comfortable. I think many complaints about uncomfortable suits are from people who only know cheap plastic suites.
That’s a shame. Did they take the wasted developer time dealing with slop into account in that discussion?
Aubergines, cucumbers, kiwi, and citrusfruit are botanical berries as well. The correct answer is that berry should be seen as a culinary term just like fruit and vegetable.