• 1 Post
  • 159 Comments
Joined 17 days ago
cake
Cake day: June 24th, 2025

help-circle

  • The loopholes on the farm bill are so big that I don’t know why we’re debating legalization at this point.

    To meet the 2018 farm bill requirements, your thing needs to have <0.3% delta-9 THC by weight. This opened up the delta-8 market–less potent but you can just add more of it–but that was only the start of exploring the new legal territory this opened up.

    10mg of THC delta-9 is considered a good sized dose in edible products. A standard can of soda is about 225 grams. So do the math: 0.01g / 225g = 0.004%. Close to two orders of magnitude under the farm bill limit, and a lot of THC seltzers come in bigger cans than that. You can sell that in every state that hasn’t specifically banned it otherwise.

    It gets even better. To get 10mg of THC delta-9, a gummy only needs to be about 3g to make the 0.3% limit. Not that big at all.

    That mostly leaves smoking/vaping as the only methods that don’t have an easy loophole.

    Just legalize it already. This is stupid.









  • And the most important advice is to leave the money the fuck alone.

    I got lucky in that I started having enough money to invest after the 2008 crash. Those years had crazy good gains. The real test comes when the market crashes 30% in a few days. Can you stick to the plan? That happened in 2020 when lockdowns started, and if you stuck to the plan, you still did very, very well that year.


  • frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zonetoLemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldstock market
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    They aren’t worth the money they’re being paid. It’s really not hard to do the most long time proven plan, which is to balance a portfolio between higher risk things like an SP500 index, and lower risk things like bonds. You weight it towards the index when you’re young to get high average returns, then back it off into lower risk as you get older to lock it in.

    “A Random Walk Down Wall Street” goes into how this strategy has been proven out over decades when so many others have failed. You technically can beat the SP500 (and be sure to include transaction costs), but only by taking on even higher risk.

    The best investment advice for most people is really, really boring and not particularly difficult. Shouldn’t even try anything else until you’re maxing out all of 401k, HSA, and IRA and then have some leftover to try the riskier strategies.


  • I could see your perception of it changing based on how you watched the movies. If your first time watching the movies was in numerical order, you might come away thinking the Jedi mind trick doesn’t work very well. It’s not really explained until episode 4. IIRC, it’s shown two times in the prequels, once against Watto (which fails) and once against a rando drug dealer in a bar (which works). It later works against Bib Fortuna but not Jabba.

    The explanation of “works against the weak minded” doesn’t come until you’re several hours in. If the movies were produced in that order, it would almost come off like a cop out explanation.




  • The issue is putting power back onto the grid. If power is out otherwise, the guys who come out to fix it want to assume there’s no power on it. If someone’s solar panels are still putting power into the local connection, it can be dangerous for those workers.

    It is possible to have an automatic disconnection so that in a grid outage, your house will still be powered, but nothing is going out to the grid. They usually don’t put those in unless you also have a battery backup. You may be able to ask your contractor to put one in, anyway.

    This goes for generators, too. You’re supposed to use a power transfer switch with those.






  • The flip side of that is entire classes of bugs being removed from modern software.

    The differences are primarily languages. A GUI in the 90s was likely programmed with C/C++. Increasingly, it’s now done in languages that have complex runtime environments like dotnet, or what is effectively a browser tab written with browser languages.

    Those C/C++ programs almost always had buffer overflows. Which were taken off of the OWASP Top 10 back in 2007, meaning the industry no longer considers it a primary threat. This should be considered a huge success. Related issues, like dynamic memory mismanagement, are also almost gone.

    There are ways to take care of buffer overflows without languages in complex managed runtimes, such as what Go and Rust do. You can have the compiler produce ASM that does array bounds checking every time while only being a smidge slower than C/C++. With SSDs all but removing the excuse that disk IO is the limiting factor, this is increasingly the way to go.

    The industry had good reasons to use complex runtimes, though some of the reasons are now changing.

    Oh, and look at what old games did to optimize things, too. The Minus World glitch in Super Mario Bros–rooted in uninitialized values of a data structure that needed to be a consistent shape–would be unlikely to happen if it were written in Python, and almost certainly wouldn’t happen in Rust. Optimizations tend to make bugs all their own.