unfortunately

where do you work?

thanks, very well put. I’m not from India, but this explanation makes sense to me.

consistently short staffed

you know they do that intentionally, right?

ja stimmt macht mehr sinn

https://wtfhappenedin1971.com/

more active workers than retirees.

Well, no, that’s actually incorrect. You only need enough productive output to sustain a social welfare system; if people’s productivity would increase to 10,000%, then 1% active workforce in the population could sustain up to 70% elderly people (assuming another 29% younger unproductive people).

It’s just that society chooses to skim off that additional wealth to some rich parasitical class.

Fear of decline

Edit: after reading the article, it’s about something else. Indian parlamentary seats depend on share of population, not on economic strengths, so some states worry to lose out.

Edit again: Well, no, my first instinct was right. The article is full of stupid people spitting hate at women for choosing to have fewer children. The article also seems to mostly think of offspring as future workforce, in other words slaves to the economy. The human population has been less than 1/1000 of what it currently is just a few thousand years ago (as can be seen in this diagram) and humanity prospered. I don’t see the problem.

Übersetzung:

Meine Reaktion als Deutscher wenn ich an diesem Wochenende den Feldspat in Unrecht zog.

– LG, ein deutschsprechender

I say once more: austerity is important. debts always have to be paid back. otherwise you’re throwing future generation under a bus. why would they suffer so?

keep pace with China

or, you know, ignore the competition for a change and ask yourself what you truly want.

yeah, you got it!

What’s happening in Gaza right now is a shame and a disgrace of humanity, and will haunt us!

Have you considered supercapacitors could be used for that?

Or through making fertile material, like uranium 238, fissile by going through the decay chain until it becomes something more spicy, like pu 239 or whatever.

Yeah that’s what i meant.

Greed is a pattern which is adopted to our current competitive environment, where everything is directed at progress and hard work. Really, humans often work 40 hours a week or more, which is significantly more time than wild animals spend to gather food. (I don’t have a source for this unfortunately, but if i remember correctly it’s maybe 2-3 hours a day.)

I think of it in another way: What these rats display is the natural behavior.

These rats live two years, so they don’t have time to learn otherwise. Human greed is a learned behavior, and it takes a lot of time to learn that.

heathens!

… which isn’t news to me.

For a time it seemed that everybody wanted to shit on animals as being way inferior to humans in every way, including lacking empathy emotion feelings and stuff.

But that was always wrong. Who has ever worked with animals be it horses dogs or farm animals knows they have a soul. Well, but also a lot of them are just evil bastards.

deleted by creator