imogen_underscore [it/its, she/her]

  • 8 Posts
  • 1.42K Comments
Joined 2 年前
cake
Cake day: 2024年2月28日

help-circle



  • no, i said you’re an ignorant idealist. you are a liberal who gives good anarchists a bad name by posting juvenile shit like this. it’s hard for me to believe you have finished high school. it’s embarrassing to think an adult would act this way habitually. hope it’s fulfilling though, sincerely. it would be a shame for you to spend all this energy on something that leaves you feeling hollow and purposeless.










  • Let us look at a specific example. A claim like “There’s cultural genocide of Uyghurs in Xinjiang” is simply unreal to most Westerners, close to pure gibberish. The words really refer to existing entities and geographies, but Westerners aren’t familiar with them. The actual content of the utterance as it spills out is no more complex or nuanced than “China Bad,” and the elementary mistakes people make when they write out statements of “solidarity” make that much clear. This is not a complaint that these people have not studied China enough — there’s no reason to expect them to study China, and retrospectively I think to some extent it was a mistake to personally have spent so much time trying to teach them. It’s instead an acknowledgment that they are eagerly wielding the accusation like a club, that they are in reality unconcerned with its truth-content, because it serves a social purpose.

    What is this social purpose? Westerners want to believe that other places are worse off, exactly how Americans and Canadians perennially flatter themselves by attacking each others’ decaying health-care systems, or how a divorcee might fantasize that their ex-lover’s blooming love-life is secretly miserable. This kind of “crab mentality” is actually a sophisticated coping mechanism suitable for an environment in which no other course of action seems viable. Cognitive dissonance, the kind that eventually spurs one into becoming intolerant of the status quo and into action, is initially unpleasant and scary for everybody. In this way, we can begin to understand the benefit that “victims” of propaganda derive from carelessly “spreading awareness.” Their efforts feed an ambient propaganda haze of controversy and scandal and wariness that suffocates any painful optimism (or jealousy) and ensuing sense of duty one might otherwise feel from a casual glance at the amazing things happening elsewhere. People aren’t “falling” for atrocity propaganda; they’re eagerly seeking it out, like a soothing balm.







  • i don’t know what you really expect from the BBC, by their standards this is quite a damning exposition. it’s not really meant to be a “critique of Israel”, just to show the truth of settlers and what they are like, their mindset which i think it does a decent job of. of course they have to get the usual October 7th spiel out of the way near the start but it mostly moves on from both sidesing after that imo. i don’t think it’s fair to say Theroux tries to both sides things, he obviously does skirt around using certain language but he repeatedly points out settlers’ hypocrisy, double standards and contradictions throughout the piece. he also asks a settler if he is from brooklyn which is hilarious.