Developer in a large company on AIX and SAP. I use both OpenBSD, NetBSD and Slackware as test systems for my work on AIX (plus for my own personal use)

  • 2 Posts
  • 22 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 26th, 2023

help-circle
  • jmcunx@lemmy.sdf.orgtoNetBSD@lemmy.sdf.orgNetBSD 10.0 @sdf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    Nice, I have NetBSD v10.0 on my Thinkpad T420, and issues I had with an external monitor has been fixed plus is is more zippy.

    The only remaining issue I have with 10.0 is when the system is under very heavy load, Xorg can get temporarily corrupted after about 1 hour of the job running. I create PR 58217 for that issue.

    In reality, I think very few people will ever run into this problem, but hoping for a 10.x fix some day :)












  • jmcunx@lemmy.sdf.orgtoOpenBSD@lemmy.sdf.orgWayland on OpenBSD
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Yes, that is what people keep saying, but isn’t sway a Tiling Window Manager ? I do not like Tiling, if something that works exactly like cwm, then I would not be too concerned about Wayland.

    So far, the only choices for Wayland seems to be GMOME3, KDE, soon XFCE, the rest are tiling like sway. I just heard about Hyprland, which is also tiling.

    So seems for me and I am sure others, the selection is very limited.


  • jmcunx@lemmy.sdf.orgtoOpenBSD@lemmy.sdf.orgWayland on OpenBSD
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Wayland requires a Desktop Environment from what I can see. There is Sway, but that is a tiling environment, but I know little about that. So for “floating windows”, all there is GNOME3, KDE and Enlightenment. DE are heavy to begin with, cwm on X is very lite on resources.

    This I am not sure about, but from what I have read, all window processing (rendering) needs to be done by the “Widow manager”. In X you just call functions.