Qualsiasi processo rende ineleggibile un candidato, cambiando potenzialmente gli equilibri di potere e forse anche il futuro di un intero paese?

Giudici che dovrebbero essere imparziali (e probabilmente in questo caso lo sono) ma rimane il fatto che questo è uno dei metodi per mettere ko un candidato e quindi favorirne un’altro, se un giudice è schierato o qualche candidato ha pagato fior di quattrini per creare prove false contro suo rivale…

Ne sono abbastanza contento, tuttavia da un lato puramente teorico non è una vera democrazia se un gruppo ristretto può permettersi di rendere ineleggibile qualcuno. Se è una persona pericolosa semplicemente il popolo dovrebbe capirlo e non votarlo… (ma mi rendo conto che è un utopia, soprattutto in america…)

People waiting for the bus stop to arrive, inside a bus

Cut that 1% by prohibiting most polluting activities of these people, would cut at maximum 16% of global emission, as stated in the article. As that’s a one-time move, emissions will continue to grow, it will just give some month at best.

How? 😂

Web Environment Integrity enters the room

Monthly fee for everyone or you mean freemium? Freemium in my opinion wont be enough to cover the cost, because works well only with services with low cost per-user. And monthly fee for everyone is a very hight incentive of not using YouTube.

Unused ram is wasted ram

I already know Searxng but never tried extensively, I might give a serious try

I’ve used duckduckgo but I remember was really slow loading results 🤔

For brave search, I’ve never took it seriously, I should try also this if you say results are good. But how they found themselves?

I’ve tried time ago but it seems to take the results and nothing else (I mean, no summary on top of the results, no table with restaurant number/time of opening ecc…) -> I don’t know how to call this

I am the only one that use Linux and bing as a default search? (On firefox) I personally think bing have better results than google right now

Oltre a quanto detto dall’articolo faccio notare che se uno non viene in macchina, ha già un passaggio, se invece viene in macchina la lascia li in disco e la va a riprendere il giorno dopo? Di solito i parcheggi delle disco non sono aperti h24 e dovresti comunque trovare un passaggio per andarla a riprendere

You need a schedulable power source if you want to fully replace carbon. A lot of batteries with super high capacity (that may exists in the future) could stabilize solar enough, and a lot of solar arrays may give enough power, but in summers you you will be forced to throw away some of the energy, which is a big waste. And this is an hypothetical scenario, nuclear is a technology that already exists, we could have decarbonised decades ago using nuclear. -> Don’t get me wrong, I don’t mean that we should rely on nuclear power alone, but we should first cover the base energy load with nuclear, then use solar and wind for the rest

This website does not support browsers that support web-drm

It shouldn’t be possible to break any service but hackers do that daily. If proper security is in place they will need some 0day exploits, but it’s not impossible, just extremely difficult

I know, but that won’t change the eventuality I described

Bro, what I said is that an attacker who someways get access to production, can push modified source code that send cleartext password to him before everything else.

If someone compromise bitwarden infrastructure can (and probably will) silently release a “new” minor version of app and webapp so that every master password is sent to him, and then decipher passwords.

It will last only some hours at worst but will still collect a lot of passwords.

That’s only thing I’m worries about, but I still use bitwarden as I think my passwords being compromised in this evenience as nearly impossible

The votes might be the one from his instance (I’ve no time to check right now), as I’ve understanded, upvotes and down votes are instance specific, so, this means for the same post: Instance a show 10 upvotes Instance b show 5 (The post is in instance a) Which means a admin know who are the 10 people but can’t know who are the 5 from instance b, and instance b admin know who are his 5 people and not the 10 from instance a. (I might be wrong, if it’s the case please correct me)