I think you may be referring to jjjacksfilms,

https://youtube.com/@jjjacksfilms/videos

Invincible. The comics are great, but I think the show dramatically improves a couple characters

No you can totally modify mail headers anytime you want to, just be prepared to get mail rejection if you’re not following current mail security best practices.

I’d recommend just renting a cheap vps from vultr or something, then you can setup your mailserver to send from anything you like. That’s how my mailserver works. I pay like $3 a month, and its plenty of space for a single user mailserver (i have like 3 mailboxes)

I did go through the work to setup dkim/dmarc/spf. Took a weekend, but wasnt too bad. My mail is received by gmail yahoo and Microsoft. I imagine doing the same with onion addressing would be complicated.

Maybe i need to further clarify that none of this is in the email RFC. Email is very old. These are new standards that everyone has agreed to on top of the RFC

That is 100% what im saying, yes. The sending server needs to sign all messages with a private DKIM key where the public key is in a dns text entry. Then the reverse dns lookup for the mailserver needs to match the SPF txt record. Then your DMARC record has to match the dkim and spf settings.

Ive set this up for exchange at work as well as my own personal mailserver, which is just a debian server running postfix and dovecot.

When you want to use gmail as a mailserver for your own domain, you set these three things up so that your messages arent all blocked.

Keep in mind, you do not need these to simply send and recieve messages, but if you want to interact with the rest of the world you do. Email is too easy to spoof, so everyone has agreed on these protocols for authenticity.

Because dmarc, DKIM, and SPF validate the domain against the sending server, not the address.

When i send from noreply@ at work, it passes dmarc, DKIM, and SPF, because the recipient mail server validates the message came from an authorized mail server for the domain (mosty based on dns entries).

Without that validation, you can certainly still send emails, but most clearnet mail hosts will drop your messages. Google, Microsoft, and yahoo at the bare minimum will

How do you expect to receive replies from clearnet users, or are you okay not receiving replies?

Also most mail hosts these days toss emails that dont match dmarc/dkim/spf, which would be especially hard to do for an onion email

Are you using defender for o365? If so, usually uou can get a copy of Any rejected messages at security.microsoft.com and get more info from the message explorer

can you drop the header in here: https://mha.azurewebsites.net/pages/mha.html

it might have some more info for you

Neovim can be used for anything you want! it’s a great experience if you’re willing to take the time and learn it

Im assuming he meant the virtual desktop vuesure yeah. Exactly what you mentioned. Its been on linux for decades but windows added it with 10

Windows 10 has multiple desktops as well

I think there are windows containers available, but even M$ has given up pushing windows server for cloud native stuff. All their tutorial docs for containers use linux haha

Just sent them to you.

Once in a blue moon i have to restart omnisharp, but its just a simple lsp restart

Much less often these days then even a year ago

I also use neovim through WSL on windows to do work

All linux! I think debian, though they have alpine images too.

I wouldnt wish windows containers on my worst enemy haha.

I use the dotnet/sdk image to build and publish into the dotnet/aspnet for runtime since it’s smaller. Both from mcr.microsoft.com

Software devs have a lot of technobabble haha!

Would you like to elaborate, or provide any information of value instead of just saying “nope”?

I do all my editing in neovim, with omnisharp as an lsp. It works pretty well. Happy to send you my dotfiles if you want.

As far as deployment, dotnet just runs on Linux now, especially if you’re do8ng web, its all the same. I deploy through containers to kubernetes, and its super smooth

Microsoft doesn’t care about you upgrading your personal computer. they care about business licenses. Enterprise pays the bills, and enterprise computers have all had TPM for ages. I don’t see any reason for them to make a change. consumers buying a new os for an existing computer is a drop in the bucket