

I think many of these questions are too vague to be answered productively, but I’ll try. I’ll just answer for myself, as I think there will be plenty of people who agree with me, and it seems kinda irrelevant what the average person thinks as long as enough people are into it. Also, your brief set of questions isn’t very brief, and I think you’d get more answers if it was more focused and pared down.
-
Very willing if it looks well thought out, has some assurance that it will stay around, and provides a good quality of life. Otherwise, no.
-
Is this just a random person? That’s a reeallly hard sell. A friend, or better a partner? Yes, assuming it’s nicely furnished, and is in a nice surrounding area, and has supporting infrastructure.
-
8-24 hours is such a big range that I couldn’t possibly answer, but I’m guessing it adds up to 40 hours. but I’m not sure how leisure factors in here, is this . I think a flexible 40 hour work schedule that factors in learning and unstructured productivity would be very appealing.
-
Definitely, and think it does change my answer for question 2, but only if there is a strong assurance that this community will exist indefinitely, or in the event that the community dissolves, that the house would then go to me.
-
Without hearing details I can’t really give an answer, but maybe? Also would I not be allowed to generate income from external sources? That sounds a bit controlling, but I’m not categorically opposed to it. I also think it would be good to capitalize on individual skills when possible, not just a few set businesses.
-
Again, 8-24 hours is a huge range, but generally yes, although I would want vacations, and exceptions for disability, sickness and old age.
-
No change, I don’t really need a big house, anyway the yurt would be the limiting factor. I think that making common spaces might be a better use of resources.
-
Direct democracy is pretty much a requirement for this sort of thing, but it would also need a ‘constitution’ that is guarantees the basic premise is maintained and nobody gets screwed over.
-
I think this is going to be the hardest part to get right. , but I think there would need to be some criteria for this, otherwise it would be abused.
-
I think this could be a real positive if done well. If there are multiple sites, I would also consider making short term stays possible. I don’t think this really changes any of my answers though.
Anyway from what you’ve hinted at, this seems like a pretty compelling idea for a commune. I would look into existing communes like Twin Oaks as examples of what works. I do think the Solarpunk/automation angle could make this really unique, though, and it could result in a really high quality of life.
I know this is probably for a school project or something, but if it’s actually something you’re thinking about for real, I have a lot of ideas, and I would be very interested in discussing it more (and maybe joining!).
Exactly. The aesthetic itself isn’t the problem (although not at all what I would want my vehicle to look like), it’s just really badly executed. Some features like the headlight bar looks cool from certain angles, but all the proportions just feel wrong, the silhouette is awful and it just looks so enormous and stupid in person.